Re: Spam and NDR
- From: "Rich Matheisen [MVP]" <richnews@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 20:23:19 -0500
"Robert Williams"
<RobertW@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>To each, his own. We are a small company with 10 employees, we don't get 1000's
>of emails per day. We did at one point, but now that I use 3 different blocking
>lists and ORFilter, their e-mails have to pass those filters first, if they do,
>then I screen them. I now get maybe 100-200 emails per week.
If you're concerned that you won't receive "important mail" becasue
it's badly addressed, have you considered that the use of 3rd-party
DNS RBL's might also be preventing you from receiving legitimate mail
simply because it originates from an IP address that's been deemed a
"spam source"? That logic seems a bit off-kilter to me.
If you use, for example, SORBS and accept their "spam" list as gospel
you're probably discarding "good" mail.
--
Rich Matheisen
MCSE+I, Exchange MVP
MS Exchange FAQ at http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Don't send mail to this address mailto:h.pott@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Or to these, either: mailto:h.pott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx mailto:melvin.mcphucknuckle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx mailto:melvin.mcphucknuckle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Spam and NDR
- From: Robert Williams
- Re: Spam and NDR
- References:
- Re: Spam and NDR
- From: Andy David - [MVP]
- ReW: Spam and NDR
- From: Robert Williams
- Re: Spam and NDR
- From: Ron
- Re: Spam and NDR
- From: Robert Williams
- Re: Spam and NDR
- Prev by Date: Re: ReW: Spam and NDR
- Next by Date: Re: ReW: Spam and NDR
- Previous by thread: Re: Spam and NDR
- Next by thread: Re: Spam and NDR
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|