Re: Exchange transactions - I'm confused!
- From: Andy David <adavid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 20:16:15 GMT
On 22 Dec 2005 11:40:50 -0800, "Mark (News)" <news@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>I think it might be worth you revisiting my original posting. If the
>logs are _spontaneously lost_, then there is an indeterminate amount of
>data loss. Don't be lulled into thinking that just because the
>transactions have been committed that they're safe - I'm talking here
>about an almost guaranteed corruption of the database that occurs after
>the stores are untidily dismounted by, presumably, the IS. The
>best-case fall back is the most recent backup which would result in a
>whole day's transactions being lost.
I have seen countless hardware issues, power failures, disk
corruption, you name it. I have been able to recover data to the
point of faiure in most cases either from backup or Exch has recovered
itself via soft recovery.. When I havent, its been because of my own
mistakes or something not related to Exch at all.
Whatever you are testing, it must not be realistic, common or valid
or it I suspect the newsgroups would be full of others encountering
the same issue.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Exchange transactions - I'm confused!
- From: Mark (News)
- Re: Exchange transactions - I'm confused!
- References:
- Exchange transactions - I'm confused!
- From: Mark (News)
- Re: Exchange transactions - I'm confused!
- From: Mark (News)
- Re: Exchange transactions - I'm confused!
- From: Andy David
- Re: Exchange transactions - I'm confused!
- From: Mark (News)
- Exchange transactions - I'm confused!
- Prev by Date: IMF Updates and custom scoring via MSExchange.UceContentFilter.xml
- Next by Date: Re: Re: Test Restore - [WildPacket]
- Previous by thread: Re: Exchange transactions - I'm confused!
- Next by thread: Re: Exchange transactions - I'm confused!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|