Re: Email delay - who is at fault - See MTA note - Full header
- From: "Tim C" <timclainc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 17:28:43 -0800
Adjusting for time zones, it took 48 hours for luna.insead.edu to
successfully connect to deliverator2.gttech.edu, probably retrying every 4
hours. There is no way to tell from this what caused the connection
problems. It could have been at either end, or anywhere in between.
Received: from luna.fbl.insead.intra (luna.insead.edu [195.101.240.144])
by deliverator2.gttech.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F903A488
for <bob.rothmel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 04:58:31 -0500 (EST)
(envelope-from overseas.user@xxxxxxxxxx)
Received: from Gaia.fbl.insead.intra ([10.30.210.57]) by
luna.fbl.insead.intra with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830);
Fri, 18 Nov 2005 10:56:44 +0100
Tim C
"BookerW" <BookerW@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:9003AC80-C4A3-44A4-84BF-3A0D399677A8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Here are the full headers of an email that my user in the gttech.edu
> domain
> received on Sunday, in which the user in the overseas domain said she sent
> on
> Friday. How do I decipher which server is at fault?
>
> Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0
> Received: from deliverator7.gttech.edu ([130.205.165.196]) by
> BDAMS.agt.bmzz
> with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211);
> Sun, 20 Nov 2005 04:58:47 -0500
> Received: from hormel5.gttech.edu (hormel1.prism.gttech.edu
> [130.205.65.11])
> (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits))
> (Client CN "hormel1.prism.gttech.edu", Issuer "Tech Support CA" (verified
> OK))
> by deliverator7.gttech.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB6C522E7
> for <bob.rothmel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 04:58:47 -0500 (EST)
> (envelope-from overseas.user@xxxxxxxxxx)
> Received: from ([130.205.65.11])
> by hormel1.gttech.edu with ESMTP with TLS id KP-BRAPX.33533146;
> Sun, 20 Nov 2005 04:58:31 -0500
> Received: from deliverator2.rttech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])
> by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99144A48D
> for <bob.rothmel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 04:58:31 -0500 (EST)
> (envelope-from overseas.user@xxxxxxxxxx)
> Received: from luna.fbl.insead.intra (luna.insead.edu [195.101.240.144])
> by deliverator2.gttech.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F903A488
> for <bob.rothmel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 04:58:31 -0500 (EST)
> (envelope-from overseas.user@xxxxxxxxxx)
> Received: from Gaia.fbl.insead.intra ([10.30.210.57]) by
> luna.fbl.insead.intra with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830);
> Fri, 18 Nov 2005 10:56:44 +0100
> x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0
> Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
> boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C5EC26.61FA7B59"
> Subject: RE: sample
> Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 10:56:44 +0100
> Message-ID:
> <8CD3C97D72BC144CB87AEBAD8D2E9732017DA41A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> X-MS-Has-Attach:
> X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
> Thread-Topic: sample
> Thread-Index: AcXctt11TLgSFfwxTJqEiNPKGdOhuAJQCmHgAWbjCpAAJOkjoA==
> From: "HOANG Ha" <overseas.user@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Rothmel, bob T" <bob.rothmel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Nov 2005 09:56:44.0492 (UTC)
> FILETIME=[61E028C0:01C5EC26]
> X-RT-Spam-Details: ESP<20>=RBL:<0> RDNS:<0> SHA:<4> UHA:<0> SLS:<0>
> BAYES:<0>
> SenderID:<0> Internal:<0> NigeriaScam Dictionary (TRU8):<0>
> ReDictionary:<0> HTML Dictionary (TRU8):<16> Adult Dictionary
> (TRU8):<0> Spam Dictionary (TRU8):<0> Embed HTML Dictionary
> (TRU8):<0> Obscenities Dictionary (TRU8):<0> URL Dictionary
> (TRU8):<0> CAN-SPAM Compliance Dictionary (TRU8):<0>
> Return-Path: overseas.user@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> ------_=_NextPart_001_01C5EC26.61FA7B59
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="us-ascii"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> ------_=_NextPart_001_01C5EC26.61FA7B59
> Content-Type: text/html;
> charset="us-ascii"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
>
> ------_=_NextPart_001_01C5EC26.61FA7B59--
>
.
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Foward to external email
- Next by Date: Re: Recip Policy
- Previous by thread: RE: Email delay - who is at fault - See MTA note - Full header
- Next by thread: stop smtp transfer from primary exchange server to secondary
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
