Re: Delivery delayed --> xxx@aol.com
- From: Daniel Tate <dshane@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 23:17:58 -0600
THK wrote:
The potential for spoofing when providing a RDNS or RMX too great. Is there another option?
.:tk:.
"Ulf Hettstedt" wrote:
There are mail servers who require a sending SMTP server to have an MX entry in the DNS record. This is a way to avoid SPAM-senders to connect from unlisted SMTP servers.
AFAIK this is against the relevant RFCs but I noticed this too, while we moved domains.
There are two ways to avoid this
1. add an MX entry for the SMTP-host
2. route the email via an "default"-SMTP host, which has an MX-entry (maybe from your internet-provider, where you have a login)
Hope this helps, Ulf
"THK" <THK@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:63213637-8424-43C0-8B71-14763BCA1884@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxHello Everyone,
An odd thing is happening. When any of my users sends an email to anyone to
the AOL.COM domain (so xxx@xxxxxxx), they get the following message:
This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. THIS IS A WARNING MESSAGE ONLY. YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESEND YOUR MESSAGE. Delivery to the following recipients has been delayed. xxx@xxxxxxx
This is a W2K3 server and every other email domain goes through OK.
Any advise?
Thanks.
.:tk:.
Afraid not; AOL's postmasters are very strict - we deal with this on an ongoing basis at my company.
You can test it by telnetting to one of AOL's mx's and starting an SMTP conversation - it'll let you know pretty quickly if you're on the BL.
-- Sincerely, Daniel S. Tate, MCSA+Messaging, Sun Certified Security, Network and Systems Administrator .
- Prev by Date: Re: Accessing Exchange 2003 via a PDA
- Next by Date: Re: big mailbox
- Previous by thread: Re: Accessing Exchange 2003 via a PDA
- Next by thread: integration with symantec antivirus
- Index(es):