Re: AD, exchange, outlook 2003 and terminal services on the same server
- From: "Rich Matheisen [MVP]" <richnews@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 12:05:02 -0400
"malux" <malux23@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>thanks for the response. Outlook/Exchange seems the real problem, I
>dont want to use unsupported configs, the next update could kill the
>system :-). I will do some tests how well clients perform with local
>AD/FILE and Outlook in cached mode.
>But disadvantage will be public folder access (sync. per user.. not
>very effective).
Not every PF would have a copy on the user's machine. Only the folders
in the user's "Favorites" are cached on the client.
>Perhaps searching for a replacement of the PF by
>pushing its to a public share in the branch. any ideas of exising
>solutions?
SharePoint. Web server. File server. How you deal with this depends on
what's in the folders. PF's are not good at document management.
SharePoint isn't very good at dealing with messages (although you can
use discussion groups on the SPS server -- the problem is that the
contents of the discussion would then have to be replicated to the SPS
servers in other locations).
--
Rich Matheisen
MCSE+I, Exchange MVP
MS Exchange FAQ at http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Don't send mail to this address mailto:h.pott@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
.
- References:
- Prev by Date: Information Store is high even after cleanout
- Next by Date: RE: What is <IDispatch error #32> error and <Memory is locked.> error?
- Previous by thread: Re: AD, exchange, outlook 2003 and terminal services on the same server
- Next by thread: XDR-Fixup failed
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
