Re: Disaster Recovery Question..
- From: "Hank Arnold" <rasilon@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 04:54:57 -0400
We've used LifeKeeper from SteelEye. Very slick, powerful and fast. Failover
can be under 5 minutes. Downside is that it's expensive and complex. I'd
recommend it as a candidate to be considered......
--
Regards,
Hank Arnold
"jim" <jim@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:utwntfFmFHA.1032@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> What 3rd party solution would you recommend? We use Veritas for backup,
> do they have something that would do the trick?
>
> "Susan" <sconkey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:eVn8xcFmFHA.2484@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> only way to do this is to use clustering, or a 3rd party solution...
>>
>> "jim" <jim@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:umo$tVFmFHA.2060@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> We've got two hardware identical servers, server1 and server2. They're
>> both
>>> Exchange 2003 on Windows 2003, back end, all the latest service packs
>>> and
>>> updates. They're in the same Admin and routing groups, and use all the
>> same
>>> connectors. Both servers are plugged into a SAN where the information
>>> stores live.
>>>
>>> My question is this...
>>>
>>> If server1 were to crash hard, is there a way to point its information
>> store
>>> to server2 so that it could be mounted and accessible to users? If so,
>>> is
>>> there a prescribed way that Microsoft recommends?
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance!
>>> jim
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
.
- References:
- Disaster Recovery Question..
- From: jim
- Re: Disaster Recovery Question..
- From: Susan
- Re: Disaster Recovery Question..
- From: jim
- Disaster Recovery Question..
- Prev by Date: auto archive messages on mailbox store
- Next by Date: Re: delete log files
- Previous by thread: Re: Disaster Recovery Question..
- Next by thread: Re: Disaster Recovery Question..
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|