Re: Storage Group
- From: "Setesh" <setesh@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 11:15:33 +0100
Other than administration, you may want to consider Disaster Recovery.
If it is important to recover, say, Faculty mailboxes immediately but
Students could wait a day or two, then you may want to have seperate storage
groups - as this would minimise the size of the SG for the Faculty and you
can concentrate on its recovery first, therefore recovery would be much
quicker.
Not important for all companies, but is for some.
Neither of these options (this or the one suggested by Ben) should cause you
any issues on a cluster.
Setesh
"Jeff Nagel" <JeffNagel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:B3CAE84C-3369-41F0-8ACB-305FF4D8CBD1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>I am new to Exchange so sorry if this is a newbie question. I have an
> Exchange 2-node cluster with a default installation. I have been told it
> is
> good practice to create different groups. I work at a college so I have
> been
> told that a Faculty, Staff, and Student group would be good practice.
> Should
> I create different storage groups for each group or just create a
> different
> Mailbox Store under the First Storage Group for each. What would be best
> for
> administration? Any other issues with creating this on a cluster?
>
> Thanks.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Storage Group
- From: Jeff Nagel
- Re: Storage Group
- References:
- Storage Group
- From: Jeff Nagel
- Storage Group
- Prev by Date: Re: Blackberry server and Exch2003
- Next by Date: Re: Exchange Server Mirroring
- Previous by thread: Re: Storage Group
- Next by thread: Re: Storage Group
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|