Re: firewall recommendation
- From: "Chris Dugan" <chrisdotdugan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 17:28:43 GMT
"John Smith" <jsmith@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ej5o09gYFHA.616@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> The current firewall (Sonicwall) belongs to the vendor who supplies us
with
> email POP3. We are installing a new exchange server soon and the vendor
> will remove the firewall. We are a defence contractor and want our users
> and clients to vpn as well as use their Outlook 2003 remotely. We also
have
> an FTP site and web server. Other than that we want to block everything
> else.
>
> Does that help or you want more specifics?
> Thanks,
> JS
>
I work for a UK defence contractor they specified the minimum security
levels and have an approved firewall list that we selected ours from. We
used to have a Sonicwall but changed it to a Cisco PIX and separate VPN
concentrator all externally managed and supported.
Chris
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: firewall recommendation
- From: John Oliver, Jr. [MVP]
- Re: firewall recommendation
- References:
- firewall recommendation
- From: John Smith
- Re: firewall recommendation
- From: David Capps
- Re: firewall recommendation
- From: John Smith
- firewall recommendation
- Prev by Date: Re: OWA multiple sites
- Next by Date: Re: Error 1068: The dependency service or group failed to start.
- Previous by thread: Re: firewall recommendation
- Next by thread: Re: firewall recommendation
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading