RE: Mailbox Manager Policies

Yes, I have tried that also. I built a custom query by using a bogus
department name and/or a custom attribute. It displays only the proper test
user (only shows the one test account) however the users still see:

" The Microsoft Exchange Server Mailbox Manager has performed an automated
cleanup of your mailbox.

For additional information contact your Exchange Administrator. "

Do I have to create a different storage group/store? On my original message,
I stated that I have one storage group and 2 stores. I think it is supposed
to work this way.

"Robert Baker [MSFT]" wrote:

> If you go to modify the query and click the find button does it return the correct results? I've tried querying on a department name it
> only pulled people with that specific name: no others were pulled and no others got a notification.
> If you havent already try using the Advanced tab to build your query.
>
> --------------------
> >Thread-Topic: Mailbox Manager Policies
> >thread-index: AcU/pFYHbXP8XkT3SPKSCgrx8H3DGQ==
> >X-WBNR-Posting-Host: 209.218.88.3
> >From: "=?Utf-8?B?U2NvdHQ=?=" <Scott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >References: <EC48FA55-6E43-4886-97EB-07FDC0EED14E@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <LC1t0BvPFHA.1960@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> <DE517BA8-0705-4C2F-B6A4-B32A47303CC8@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4U7ITz4PFHA.2944@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Subject: RE: Mailbox Manager Policies
> >Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 14:12:30 -0700
> >Lines: 151
> >Message-ID: <7751354C-1599-43E0-8230-5819329F2CDD@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >MIME-Version: 1.0
> >Content-Type: text/plain;
> > charset="Utf-8"
> >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> >X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
> >Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
> >Importance: normal
> >Priority: normal
> >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.0
> >Newsgroups: microsoft.public.exchange.admin
> >Path: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl
> >Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.exchange.admin:59168
> >NNTP-Posting-Host: tk2msftngxa03.phx.gbl 10.40.2.157
> >X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.exchange.admin
> >
> >Thanks again Robert....
> >
> >I ran it as you suggested and the same query/filter information shows up.
> >Here is an example of the policy. I am using the Store name and a department
> >as a rule set (Email Retention Store and "Processing"). I have tried them
> >seperately also:
> >
> >(&(&(&(& (mailnickname=*) (|
> >(&(objectCategory=person)(objectClass=user)(homeMDB=CN=Email Retention
> >Store,CN=First Storage
> >Group,CN=InformationStore,CN=Servername,CN=Servers,CN=MySite,CN=Administrative
> >Groups,CN=NCH,CN=Microsoft
> >Exchange,CN=Services,CN=Configuration,DC=mydomain,DC=com))
> >)))(objectCategory=user)(department=Processing*)))
> >
> >EBPA showed the same string yet my users all get the message. Any other
> >suggestions?
> >
> >
> >"Robert Baker [MSFT]" wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Scott,
> >>
> >> Here is a way to test your search. Download the ExBPA tool from the microsoft site http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/exbpa
> >> Run the tool and expand the Exchange server object down through the recipient policies object. the purported serch is the LDAP
> >> filter used for the policy. You could use LDIFDE like this
> >>
> >> ldifde -f output.ldf -f "=(&(&(& (mailnickname=*) (| (&(objectCategory=person)(objectClass=user)(|(homeMDB=*)
> >> (msExchHomeServerName=*)))(objectCategory=group) ))))" -dn
> >>
> >> This will create a report (output.ldf) that you can look at to make sure your filter is correct.
> >>
> >>
> >> The section between the quotes is the purported search from the exbpa output.
> >>
> >> I don't mean to be continually harping on this but I've tested this with my own systems and the only person who get the notification
> is
> >> the one person who I have filtered for. My filter was based on the email address.
> >>
> >>
> >> --------------------
> >> >Thread-Topic: Mailbox Manager Policies
> >> >thread-index: AcU/hACCkr1TeaR8T3SNwoupvLyfxQ==
> >> >X-WBNR-Posting-Host: 209.218.88.3
> >> >From: "=?Utf-8?B?U2NvdHQ=?=" <Scott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> >References: <EC48FA55-6E43-4886-97EB-07FDC0EED14E@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <LC1t0BvPFHA.1960
> @TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl>
> >> >Subject: RE: Mailbox Manager Policies
> >> >Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 10:21:02 -0700
> >> >Lines: 73
> >> >Message-ID: <DE517BA8-0705-4C2F-B6A4-B32A47303CC8@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> >MIME-Version: 1.0
> >> >Content-Type: text/plain;
> >> > charset="Utf-8"
> >> >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> >> >X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
> >> >Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
> >> >Importance: normal
> >> >Priority: normal
> >> >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.0
> >> >Newsgroups: microsoft.public.exchange.admin
> >> >NNTP-Posting-Host: TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl 10.40.1.29
> >> >Path: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl
> >> >Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.exchange.admin:59129
> >> >X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.exchange.admin
> >> >
> >> >Thanks Robert, but it does the same thing. I show the context of the policy
> >> >to apply against the one user in that particular store, my test ID. However,
> >> >when I run the policy by right clicking my server in the ESM and choosing
> >> >Start Mailbox Manager Process, it starts crawling the entire mail system, not
> >> >the single store I have filtered in the recipient policy. Each user gets a
> >> >mail message from the system attendant. Am I doing some thing wrong here?
> >> >
> >> >"Robert Baker [MSFT]" wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Hi Scott,
> >> >>
> >> >> Test the mailbox manager policy by clicking on "Modify" and then "Find Now" This will show you the results of the LDAP filter
> on
> >> the
> >> >> General tab. If you only see the users on the on mailbox store then you are good to go. It won't process anything that is not
> within
> >> the
> >> >> scope of the filter.
> >> >>
> >> >> I hope that helps,
> >> >> --------------------
> >> >> >Thread-Topic: Mailbox Manager Policies
> >> >> >thread-index: AcU+rxsdpvmfD6UjQZGXGg1PJ2/WmA==
> >> >> >X-WBNR-Posting-Host: 209.218.88.3
> >> >> >From: "=?Utf-8?B?U2NvdHQ=?=" <Scott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> >> >Subject: Mailbox Manager Policies
> >> >> >Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 08:57:04 -0700
> >> >> >Lines: 21
> >> >> >Message-ID: <EC48FA55-6E43-4886-97EB-07FDC0EED14E@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> >> >MIME-Version: 1.0
> >> >> >Content-Type: text/plain;
> >> >> > charset="Utf-8"
> >> >> >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> >> >> >X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
> >> >> >Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
> >> >> >Importance: normal
> >> >> >Priority: normal
> >> >> >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.0
> >> >> >Newsgroups: microsoft.public.exchange.admin
> >> >> >NNTP-Posting-Host: TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl 10.40.1.29
> >> >> >Path: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl
> >> >> >Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.exchange.admin:58935
> >> >> >X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.exchange.admin
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Hi all,
> >> >> > I have an Exchange 2003 Server with 2 stores under a single storage group,
> >> >> >store #1 and store #2. The goal is to define and apply a deletion of email
> >> >> >one year old on store #2. Store #1 should remain in tact. I have created the
> >> >> >Recipient Policy and used a filter rule to isolate it to Store #2 only. Now,
> >> >> >the issue. I recall from setting a policy when I had a single store, that if
> >> >> >I turn ON the mailbox manager policy, it emails all users. 9Maybe this is
> >> >> >because I had one store and the filter wasnt isolated??)
> >> >> >
> >> >> >My question/concern is, if I filter this process to just the #2 store and
> >> >> >enable the mailbox manager policy to run, will it still email the users in
> >> >> >store #1 even though its not under policy? The last time this happened, I had
> >> >> >it to report only and of cource, they freaked on me. Some even claimed they
> >> >> >lost email!
> >> >> >
> >> >> >I think the answer is no, it will only email/apply to users in store #2, but
> >> >> >I just want a little hand holding to make sure I am on the right track. Your
> >> >> >timely responses are greatly appreciated.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >>
> >> >> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. Use of included script samples are subject to the
> terms
> >> >> specified at http://www.microsoft.com/info/cpyright.htm
> >> >>
> >> >> Note: For the benefit of the community-at-large, all responses to this message are best directed to the newsgroup/thread from
> >> >> which they originated.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. Use of included script samples are subject to the terms
> >> specified at http://www.microsoft.com/info/cpyright.htm
> >>
> >> Note: For the benefit of the community-at-large, all responses to this message are best directed to the newsgroup/thread from
> >> which they originated.
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
> --
>
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. Use of included script samples are subject to the terms
> specified at http://www.microsoft.com/info/cpyright.htm
>
> Note: For the benefit of the community-at-large, all responses to this message are best directed to the newsgroup/thread from
> which they originated.
>
>
.

Loading