Re: ADC removal from administrative group in a multi-administrative group organization



Hi Mike,

There should be a recipient policy for each 5.5 site. Sites in 5.5 are called Administrative groups in E2k(3). In mixed mode you want
to have one RUS policy per site.
--------------------
>From: "Mike G." <mikegreen@xxxxxxxxx>
>Newsgroups: microsoft.public.exchange.admin
>Subject: Re: ADC removal from administrative group in a multi-administrative group organization
>Date: 12 Apr 2005 12:54:19 -0700
>Organization: http://groups.google.com
>Lines: 90
>Message-ID: <1113335659.290130.310650@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>References: <1113231227.633085.172710@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> <JVOzw#uPFHA.2944@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>NNTP-Posting-Host: 208.191.131.114
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>X-Trace: posting.google.com 1113335680 25740 127.0.0.1 (12 Apr 2005 19:54:40 GMT)
>X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@xxxxxxxxxx
>NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 19:54:40 +0000 (UTC)
>In-Reply-To: <JVOzw#uPFHA.2944@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>User-Agent: G2/0.2
>Complaints-To: groups-abuse@xxxxxxxxxx
>Injection-Info: o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=208.191.131.114;
> posting-account=a3Bf8AwAAAAUWNFOWSgNNbpzMJsnJhzQ
>Path: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!fr.ip.ndsoftware.net!proxad.net!
216.239.36.134.MISMATCH!postnews.google.com!o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
>Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.exchange.admin:59165
>X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.exchange.admin
>
>Great, thanks for the answer so fast.
>
>One other question.
>
>I shutdown the 5.5 server to test mail flow without the 5.5 server
>before I remove it and mail seemed to flow except for one problem. I
>was able to send email to the other administrative group but the user
>who has his mailbox on the E2k3 server would get undeliverables when
>replying to my email while the user with the mailbox on Exchange 5.5
>was able to reply to me without any problems. I'm not sure where the
>problem is since it is happening between me and another E2k3 user. If
>I can send to them but they can't reply to me is it something with
>their routing or mine? And if so, where do I need to look or have them
>look besides the routing connectors for the possible problem.
>
>I would think it would be something on their end since I can send to
>them and they receive it, but I may be wrong.
>
>Thanks for the help.
>
>Mike
>
>
>Robert Baker [MSFT] wrote:
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> You can remove the ADC now. The Config_CA is tied to the Site
>(5.5)/Admin group (200x) and there is an SRS for each site/AG.
>> Follow the article and remove the 5.5 server.
>>
>> I hope that helps.
>> --------------------
>> >From: mikegreen@xxxxxxxxx
>> >Newsgroups: microsoft.public.exchange.admin
>> >Subject: ADC removal from administrative group in a
>multi-administrative group organization
>> >Date: 11 Apr 2005 07:53:47 -0700
>> >Organization: http://groups.google.com
>> >Lines: 14
>> >Message-ID: <1113231227.633085.172710@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >NNTP-Posting-Host: 208.191.131.114
>> >Mime-Version: 1.0
>> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>> >X-Trace: posting.google.com 1113231233 26821 127.0.0.1 (11 Apr 2005
>14:53:53 GMT)
>> >X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@xxxxxxxxxx
>> >NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 14:53:53 +0000 (UTC)
>> >User-Agent: G2/0.2
>> >Complaints-To: groups-abuse@xxxxxxxxxx
>> >Injection-Info: g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com;
>posting-host=208.191.131.114;
>> > posting-account=a3Bf8AwAAAAUWNFOWSgNNbpzMJsnJhzQ
>> >Path:
>TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!news.glorb.com!
>> postnews.google.com!g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
>> >Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.exchange.admin:58923
>> >X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.exchange.admin
>> >
>> >I have a question on when to remove the ADC in a mixed environement.
>> >Here is a little background on the setup. We currently have three
>> >administrative groups for each of our companies that are all under
>one
>> >organization in Exchange. Our company's administrative group has
>> >migrated completely over to Exchange 2003. Our other administrative
>> >groups still have Exchange 5.5 users so they are needing to keep
>their
>> >5.5 servers for awhile but they do have Exchange 2003 servers and
>have
>> >ADC's within each of those adminisrative groups. I am wanting to
>> >remove the 5.5 server from our administrative group and have gone
>> >through KB822450 to prep the removal. My question is since the
>other
>> >administrative groups still need their 5.5 servers do I need to keep
>my
>> >ADC or since they have ADC's in their administrative groups can I
>> >remove my ADC after removing 5.5? Thanks.
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
>rights. Use of included script samples are subject to the terms
>> specified at http://www.microsoft.com/info/cpyright.htm
>>
>> Note: For the benefit of the community-at-large, all responses to
>this message are best directed to the newsgroup/thread from
>> which they originated.
>
>


--

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. Use of included script samples are subject to the terms
specified at http://www.microsoft.com/info/cpyright.htm

Note: For the benefit of the community-at-large, all responses to this message are best directed to the newsgroup/thread from
which they originated.

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Migrating Exchange 5.5 servers to Exchange 2003
    ... exchange server 5.5 and UK DC. ... There is definitely no ADC in Belgium. ...
    (microsoft.public.exchange.setup)
  • RE: SRS deletion
    ... ADC and SRS. ... cleanly remove the Exchange 5.5 server from Exchange 2003 administrative ... your Exchange 2003 or Windows 2003 DC server. ...
    (microsoft.public.exchange.admin)
  • Re: How to specify an exchange 2003 as remote bridgehead?
    ... We are also planning a year to go to Exchange 2007. ... I think with an administrative group with only RGs, ... Exchange server to their own RG. ... In the Routing Groups container, ...
    (microsoft.public.exchange.admin)
  • Re: MSADC 8355 LDAP Result failed
    ... If you put Exchange on one, then you won't need the other:) ... have another DC that is my global catalog server. ... think of no reason that it would "listen" to anything on that port. ... ADC is trying to start on port 389, but it is already in use since ...
    (microsoft.public.exchange.setup)
  • Re: removing exchange 2003 objects once exchange 2007 is in place
    ... Was EXCHANGE\0ADEL your Ex 2003 server? ... Also for the first error did you move your public folder hiearchy? ... On your Exchange 2003 or Exchange 2000 server, ... Exchange 2000 administrative group to the Exchange 2007 administrative ...
    (microsoft.public.exchange.admin)