Re: Exchange 2003 Info Store Backup with Veritas 9.x
From: stosti (stosti_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 01/25/05
- Next message: Rich Matheisen [MVP]: "Re: ISA won't be my main firewall"
- Previous message: Jim Schwartz: "Re: "splitting" up a Mailbox store"
- In reply to: Ben Winzenz [Exchange MVP]: "Re: Exchange 2003 Info Store Backup with Veritas 9.x"
- Next in thread: Hank Arnold: "Re: Exchange 2003 Info Store Backup with Veritas 9.x"
- Reply: Hank Arnold: "Re: Exchange 2003 Info Store Backup with Veritas 9.x"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 17:47:02 -0800
I have tried everything that you have suggested. I have an active case with
Microsoft and Veritas. Neither know what is up here. I have all the latest
hot fixes, drivers and software. This has been a bad experience! I believe
the problem is with Veritas but I can say for certain I did not have these
problems with Exchange 2000. My backup environment has not changed since I
upgraded... Just the version of exchange has.
I just bought an ML 330 server with dual xenon CPU's and 4 GB ram. Maybe
that will help! When the 400/800 HP LTO tape drives are released in march I
will buy one!
Regards,
Scott
"Ben Winzenz [Exchange MVP]" wrote:
> My point was in order to get Gig, you have to set it to autodetect, which it
> sounds like you have. You are correct in that you should not set it to
> 100/Full. If you do, then you can't get Gig.
>
> If it backs up in half the time with NTBackup, it doesn't appear to be an
> Exchange problem, rather a BackupExec problem. Have you also tried using
> BExec to back up Exchange to disk (instead of to tape) to see if that
> results in faster backup speed? What kind of backup hardware are you using?
> Are you sure that you've got the latest BExec Exchange Agents? It sounds to
> me like you ought to open a support case with Veritas. Doing a flat file
> backup won't be using the Veritas Exchange Agent, which seems to verify that
> it is the agent that is the problem.
>
> Have you tried running a dedicated job for Exchange, or is it included in
> your normal job? If it is included in your normal job, have you tried
> moving it to the very top of the list, or having it run as the last thing?
> Have you also ensured that the "priority" of your job is "Highest"?
>
> At my last place, when we first installed our backup hardware and Backup
> Exec, we were having horrible throughput. Like 200mb/sec. That's really
> bad for SDLT. We ended up updated the tape drive firmware, getting a newer
> build of BackupExec, making a few other changes, and after that, we would
> see throughput speeds of closer to 1000mb/sec. Make sure that you have the
> latest build of BackupExec.
>
> --
> Ben Winzenz
> Exchange MVP
>
>
> "stosti" <stosti@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:1FE5689D-42C5-4FE2-8976-605FCE0B115C@microsoft.com...
> > Why 100 Full? Then your not running gig?
> >
> > I'm backing up the info store with veritas not brick...
> >
> > I backed up with NT Backup. It takes half the time...
> >
> > If I stop the services and do a flat file backup the backup runs 6 times
> > faster across the network. The only bad performance item I have is
> > exchange
> > while it is running...
> >
> > Regards,
> > Scott
> >
> > "Ben Winzenz [Exchange MVP]" wrote:
> >
> >> Don't be so quick to blame the problem on Exchange. Have you checked NIC
> >> drivers, tape drive drivers, backup software version? Are you sure that
> >> you
> >> haven't forced the NIC to 100 Full instead of autodetect for Gig? Have
> >> you
> >> ever updated the NIC drivers? I have literally never seen a problem with
> >> slow backups where Exchange itself is the problem. It is virtually
> >> always
> >> driver-related. Have you also tried to perform a local backup (using
> >> NTBackup) to back up the Exchange 2003 server to disk? How long does
> >> that
> >> take? What kind of backup are you performing? It sounds like you are
> >> doing
> >> a brick-level backup (mailbox level).
> >>
> >> --
> >> Ben Winzenz
> >> Exchange MVP
> >>
> >>
> >> "stosti" <stosti@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> >> news:6CEE8368-1D83-40A0-9C08-9DE79D2A2641@microsoft.com...
> >> > My servers are all connected with GB NIC cards and into an HP GB
> >> > switch.
> >> > I
> >> > thought that would help as well. It did not! The issue is Exchange...
> >> > I
> >> > can stop the info store service and backup the flat file in 1/3 the
> >> > time.
> >> > All my other backups afe fast. Just live backups of Exchange 2003 is
> >> > slow.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Scott
> >> >
> >> > "Brian P. Hammer" <bhammer@le "DASH" wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Not to fix your problem, but I moved our Exchange and backup server to
> >> >> a
> >> >> Gig
> >> >> network. It cut down the time by 2/3
> >> >>
> >> >> Brian
> >> >>
> >> >> "stosti" <stosti@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> >> >> news:1C4CF3CC-2681-43F7-9ABC-4589ECDC82B6@microsoft.com...
> >> >> >I have an 80 GB Info Store. When I was using Exchange 2000 it took <
> >> >> >12
> >> >> > hours to backup the database across the network. We converted to
> >> >> > Exchange
> >> >> > 2003 in September. It now takes 17 hours to backup the info store.
> >> >> > Why
> >> >> > is
> >> >> > Exchange 2003 so slow to backup? Is there anything that can be done
> >> >> > to
> >> >> > increase performance?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Thanks,
> >> >> > Scott
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>
>
- Next message: Rich Matheisen [MVP]: "Re: ISA won't be my main firewall"
- Previous message: Jim Schwartz: "Re: "splitting" up a Mailbox store"
- In reply to: Ben Winzenz [Exchange MVP]: "Re: Exchange 2003 Info Store Backup with Veritas 9.x"
- Next in thread: Hank Arnold: "Re: Exchange 2003 Info Store Backup with Veritas 9.x"
- Reply: Hank Arnold: "Re: Exchange 2003 Info Store Backup with Veritas 9.x"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|