Re: Reverse Lookup & Spam
From: Lanwench [MVP - Exchange] (lanwench_at_heybuddy.donotsendme.unsolicitedmail.atyahoo.com)
Date: 12/09/04
- Next message: Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]: "Re: bad file in SMTP mailbox"
- Previous message: Skipster: "front end server"
- In reply to: cldpeak: "Reverse Lookup & Spam"
- Next in thread: cldpeak: "Re: Reverse Lookup & Spam"
- Reply: cldpeak: "Re: Reverse Lookup & Spam"
- Reply: Rich Matheisen [MVP]: "Re: Reverse Lookup & Spam"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 22:45:21 -0500
cldpeak wrote:
> Is it common for various corporations to use reverse lookup (ptr
> records) to verify e-mail and drop those that don't resolve as spam?
It's starting to be more common, asinine though I find it.
>
> I was planning to start running my own DNS servers so that I could
> allow clients more freedom in choosing their ISP without me dealing
> with the old ISP maintained DNS records.
I wouldn't bother as you need two extra DNS servers on your network to do
this and you're unlikely to have as robust a network/Internet connection as
a hosting company does - if your ISP isn't responsive, try moving to someone
else who's better.
>
> However, I remember a time when a client could not send mail (to GAP
> inc. in particular) turned out they use reverse lookups and would not
> accept mail until I had the ISP create the PTR records.
The ISP, not the DNS host. Unrelated....
>
> So, if running my own DNS I would not have the authority to create
> the PTR record for an IP address that belonged to an ISP right? I'll
> still have to pay the DNS hosting records with the ISP unless there
> is a way around it...
Not really relevant, because as I said you wouldn't create the reverse
lookup for your public IP anyway - whoever owns that netblock would do it.
>
> opinions?
- Next message: Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]: "Re: bad file in SMTP mailbox"
- Previous message: Skipster: "front end server"
- In reply to: cldpeak: "Reverse Lookup & Spam"
- Next in thread: cldpeak: "Re: Reverse Lookup & Spam"
- Reply: cldpeak: "Re: Reverse Lookup & Spam"
- Reply: Rich Matheisen [MVP]: "Re: Reverse Lookup & Spam"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|