Re: Auto-Accept Agent event sink for Exchange Server 2003 help!

Tech Tip: Click here to run a free scan for Windows Errors and optimize PC performance

From: Evan Dodds [MSFT] (evand_at_online.microsoft.com)
Date: 09/22/04


Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 14:15:37 -0400

Rick -

I would try to schedule a meeting requests against the registered resource
for some out-of-the-way time (say, 11pm Saturday night) and see if the agent
handles the request. If it accepts or declines the request as you would
expect, you know it is working. If it provides no response, it's not
registered or something else has gone wrong -- this you can troubleshoot
with the tracing capability of the agent.

-- 
Evan Dodds
Microsoft Exchange Support
****** Disclaimer ******
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
Note: Please do not reply to this e-mail address. It is used for newsgroup
purposes only.
"Rick Newton" <rnewton@herpersgowling.com> wrote in message 
news:4ic3l0h94tlmspfl7ufdftjogb647pfln3@4ax.com...
> Evan,
>
> That's just the thing... I don't know for certain that all is working
> as it should.  I think that it is only because a second execution of
> the RegisterMailbox.vbs returned notifications that each resource
> account was already registered to the sink event.
>
> Would you consider this enough "proof" that all is working?
>
> Thanks for you assistance... I will also take your suggestion and
> attempt to run the MailboxStatus script from the Windows 2000 server
> and a Windows XP system in the domain and see if there results aren't
> different.
>
> ----
> Rick.
>
> On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:03:39 -0400, "Evan Dodds [MSFT]"
> <evand@online.microsoft.com> wrote:
>
>>Rick -
>>
>>That's the only thing I've run into which caused this problem (which is 
>>not
>>to say that it might not be caused in your case by something totally
>>different). It looks to me like you've got everything set properly, but it
>>might still be advantageous to try it from at least one or two other
>>workstations or servers to see if they demonstrate identical behavior with
>>their default IE settings. You could also do some analysis with network
>>monitor to see what's really getting passed between the workstation and
>>server. At the end of the day, however, it's really going to come down to
>>how much time you want to spend looking into this display problem since 
>>you
>>know the mailboxes are properly registered and functional.
> 


Relevant Pages

  • Re: Auto-Accept Agent event sink for Exchange Server 2003 help!
    ... I've run the script from a coupld of other systems, ... >I would try to schedule a meeting requests against the registered resource ... If it accepts or declines the request as you would ... >with the tracing capability of the agent. ...
    (microsoft.public.exchange.admin)
  • [REVS] NTLM HTTP Authentication is Insecure By Design
    ... in front of a web server, and that proxy server shares a single TCP ... These are attacks that make use of non-RFC HTTP requests (HTTP Request ... the authentication is associated with the ...
    (Securiteam)
  • [NT] 04WebServer Multiple Vulnerabilities (CSS, Log File Injection, AUX DoS)
    ... 04WebServer is a HTTP server developed by Soft3304 for Windows platforms. ... Characters into Log File ... filtering on the request URL before writing it into the log file. ... following HTTP request, when submitted to a vulnerable 04WebServer, will ...
    (Securiteam)
  • Re: breaking the model
    ... > The forms data then is in the Request object. ... HTTP Request; in this case, the form POST Request from the Page. ... client and server. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet)
  • Re: Anonymous Anonymity - Request For Comments
    ... > and request that you reply directly to my e-mail address. ... > for the entity wishing to preserve their anonymity. ... > the machine can perform as a Intermediary Server and / or as a Intermediary ... > The software then attempts connection to a Intermediary Server. ...
    (Bugtraq)