Re: How to handle false positives when using anti-spam, anti-junk e-mail solutions
From: Tamira Smithson (tsmith_at_rsff.com)
Date: 09/20/04
- Next message: Koumin Balumin: "Re: Exchange 2003 in Exchange 2000 network"
- Previous message: netgrapper: "Public Folder Access Denied"
- In reply to: Marlon Brown: "Re: How to handle false positives when using anti-spam, anti-junk e-mail solutions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 07:19:59 -0400
Tagging emails is a good way to avoid false positives. However, a better
way is to use a program that sends a report to the end user every day
that tells them which emails are quarantined. This way if a false
positive occurs they only check one message not 100. Use Spam
Marshall(http://www.spammarshall.com), which can change the subject line
as send daily email summary to all users.
Marlon Brown wrote:
> You guys rule. By tagging the potential spam mail with [SPAM] should be a
> nice way. From there do you instruct users how to set filters on Outlook
> client, or you set the a type of SPAM-Folder-Filter from the Exchange server
> side ?
>
>
> "John D" <praetorian7x-news@yahoo.com> w
> rote in message news:S76dnb3uzN4hZdTcRVn-tg@giganews.com...
>
>>I don't have GFI delete the item, I've been letting the mail go through to
>>the user to a SPAM folder, or to add [SPAM] to the subject line so they
>
> can
>
>>do some of the filtering "for me".
>>
>>If they get a false positive, I've istructed them to forward it to me and
>
> I
>
>>whitelist the sender.
>>
>>I also have their anti-virus software, which I have set to delete, and
>>reduces most of the quarantining I have to manage.
>>
>>--
>>John Dotson
>>praetorian7x-news@yahoo.com
>>"Marlon Brown" <marlon_brown@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:#x9AIWBnEHA.2216@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
>>
>>>I have purchased GFI MailEssentiasl10 and so far that seems to be
>
> working
>
>>>fine.
>>>
>>>I think false positives will happen especially in the begnning of our
>>>implementation, and I would like to confirm what's the best way to
>
> handle
>
>>>that. What I am doing here is that I asked management to designate an
>>>assistant that should read on the e-mails caught by the junk filter and
>>>notify recipient in case she suspects that is a false positive. Any
>
> other
>
>>>ideas ?
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
- Next message: Koumin Balumin: "Re: Exchange 2003 in Exchange 2000 network"
- Previous message: netgrapper: "Public Folder Access Denied"
- In reply to: Marlon Brown: "Re: How to handle false positives when using anti-spam, anti-junk e-mail solutions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|