Re: Exchange 2003 oddity
From: Curt Shaffer (curt_at_chilitech.net)
Date: 07/22/04
- Next message: Chris Scharff [MVP]: "Re: Interorganization migration"
- Previous message: Mark Arnold [MVP]: "Re: Over limit message"
- In reply to: Marty: "Exchange 2003 oddity"
- Next in thread: Mark Arnold [MVP]: "Re: Exchange 2003 oddity"
- Reply: Mark Arnold [MVP]: "Re: Exchange 2003 oddity"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 10:49:00 -0400
But would it put the check in the do not mount on boot in the properties of
the store?
"Marty" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:203201c46ff6$9140d680$a401280a@phx.gbl...
> Check you event logs. The only time I have seen this
> happen is when another problem exists at boot that is
> preventing the Stores from being mounted.
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>Just a question for everyone out there. I just did an
> install of Exchange
>>2003 (for the first time) and I noticed something I found
> odd. It seems that
>>the default setting on the mailbox/public stores is not
> to mount on boot. Is
>>there a valid reason for this? Just wondering because I
> got a call from the
>>company saying that their exchange wasn't working and I
> found that the
>>stores were not mounted and that was the reason. I
> mounted them and removed
>>that check and now they are good to go. Odd : \
>>
>>Curt
>>
>>
>>.
>>
- Next message: Chris Scharff [MVP]: "Re: Interorganization migration"
- Previous message: Mark Arnold [MVP]: "Re: Over limit message"
- In reply to: Marty: "Exchange 2003 oddity"
- Next in thread: Mark Arnold [MVP]: "Re: Exchange 2003 oddity"
- Reply: Mark Arnold [MVP]: "Re: Exchange 2003 oddity"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
