Exchange 2003 oddity

From: Marty (anonymous_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 07/22/04


Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 07:17:06 -0700

Check you event logs. The only time I have seen this
happen is when another problem exists at boot that is
preventing the Stores from being mounted.

>-----Original Message-----
>Just a question for everyone out there. I just did an
install of Exchange
>2003 (for the first time) and I noticed something I found
odd. It seems that
>the default setting on the mailbox/public stores is not
to mount on boot. Is
>there a valid reason for this? Just wondering because I
got a call from the
>company saying that their exchange wasn't working and I
found that the
>stores were not mounted and that was the reason. I
mounted them and removed
>that check and now they are good to go. Odd : \
>
>Curt
>
>
>.
>



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Exchange 2003 oddity
    ... > happen is when another problem exists at boot that is ... > to mount on boot. ... >>there a valid reason for this? ... >>stores were not mounted and that was the reason. ...
    (microsoft.public.exchange.admin)
  • [PATCH] Clean up empty_zero_page abuse
    ... > zero after boot. ... This patch (against EWB's boot segment patch) fixes the abuse of ... # A buffer of size EDDMAXNR*is reserved for our use ... -# A second one-byte buffer, EDDNR, in the empty_zero_page stores ...
    (Linux-Kernel)
  • Re: Exchange 2003 oddity
    ... No, the default is to mount at boot, certainly on the default stores ... in a fresh install. ...
    (microsoft.public.exchange.admin)
  • Re: Boot Files
    ... Can someone tell me where windows 2000 stores its boot files? ... I know windows xp is C:. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: Boot Files
    ... Can someone tell me where windows 2000 stores its boot files? ... I know windows xp is C:. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)