Re: Questions on data security
From: Frank Castro [MSFT] (fcastro_at_online.microsoft.com)
Date: 02/20/04
- Next message: Frank Castro [MSFT]: "Re: Anybody know what this means???? How do I stop it??"
- Previous message: Frank Castro [MSFT]: "Re: Exchange 5.5 offline defrag time frame??"
- In reply to: Fabry: "Questions on data security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 15:53:42 -0600
The advantage would be faster local access and less stress on the server.
This is also ideal with servers located in remote offices or saturated
networks. The disadvantages is a latency in delivery (delivery notification
is not immediate) and some third party applications will not work properly
in cached mode (http://support.microsoft.com/?id=834496).
Having a second local backup copy is technically possible as the client can
access the data while not connected to the server, but the primary focus
should still be the server itself. As soon as the client hits the wire, it
will resynch with the server and update any changes (including client side
snafu's) that have been made. We always want the server to be
authoritative.
-- Regards, Frank Castro fcastro@online.microsoft.com "Fabry" <fabry@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:c152sb$1dnl3g$1@ID-181881.news.uni-berlin.de... > Hi, > > if i set all MsOutlook client in my 2000 network with Exchange2003 in > "Offline use" what can be the advantages and the disadvatages ? > > I say this because i think that in this mode is possible to have a double > security backup, one in each client on the network and one on the type of my > server. > > Is it correct my opinion ? > > What do you think ? > > Thanks a lot > >
- Next message: Frank Castro [MSFT]: "Re: Anybody know what this means???? How do I stop it??"
- Previous message: Frank Castro [MSFT]: "Re: Exchange 5.5 offline defrag time frame??"
- In reply to: Fabry: "Questions on data security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
