15 Significant Digits Limitation a Mistake for Spatial Information
- From: Matthew <Matthew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 14:14:01 -0700
The IEEE Standard of limiting 15 significant digits of precision is a
practical mistake for Microsoft to follow. Especially for marking Latitude &
Longitude coordinates for geocodes and establishing and storing boundaries
for maps at zoomed levels. Take for instance, a latitude value of
39.729831646409565 in Denver Colorado. Excel only stores it as
39.7298316464095. The longitude of -105.02543449401855 is stored as
-105.025434494018. You loose two significant digits of accuracy for this
spacial information.
Can the decision be reevaluated for practical purposes?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 15 Significant Digits Limitation a Mistake for Spatial Information
- From: Howard Kaikow
- Re: 15 Significant Digits Limitation a Mistake for Spatial Information
- From: JP
- Re: 15 Significant Digits Limitation a Mistake for Spatial Information
- From: Howard Kaikow
- Re: 15 Significant Digits Limitation a Mistake for Spatial Information
- From: joeu2004
- Re: 15 Significant Digits Limitation a Mistake for Spatial Information
- From: Shane Devenshire
- Re: 15 Significant Digits Limitation a Mistake for Spatial Information
- From: Nick
- Re: 15 Significant Digits Limitation a Mistake for Spatial Information
- From: MartinW
- Re: 15 Significant Digits Limitation a Mistake for Spatial Information
- From: Ron Rosenfeld
- RE: 15 Significant Digits Limitation a Mistake for Spatial Information
- From: Matthew
- Re: 15 Significant Digits Limitation a Mistake for Spatial Information
- Prev by Date: Re: Sorting and Column Headers
- Next by Date: RE: Excel crash when using user defined chart
- Previous by thread: Sorting and Column Headers
- Next by thread: RE: 15 Significant Digits Limitation a Mistake for Spatial Information
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading