Re: Glaring Excel calc bug.
- From: LurfysMa <invalid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 10:16:20 -0700
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 06:32:29 -0400, "Earl Kiosterud"
<someone@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I've often wondered, aren't computers fast enough these days that they could do decimal
math, instead of having to do binary conversions? Even if the decimal math had do be done
in software? Better yet, of course, would be for the CPU do be able to do it natively, as
IBM systems were doing decades ago. It seems to me we mess around with having to handle the
errors for a far greater time than additional time the computer might need, even for a large
job. Just a thought.
The Rexx programming language does all calculations in decimal to
arbitrary precision (limited only by available memory).
.
- References:
- Glaring Excel calc bug.
- From: baobob
- Re: Glaring Excel calc bug.
- From: Earl Kiosterud
- Glaring Excel calc bug.
- Prev by Date: Pivot Table - Change Data source
- Next by Date: Changing a text name within a cell based on file name
- Previous by thread: Re: Glaring Excel calc bug.
- Next by thread: Conditional Formatting Excel 2007
- Index(es):