Re: Glaring Excel calc bug.
- From: Harlan Grove <hrlngrv@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 11:24:19 -0700
"Earl Kiosterud" <some...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote...
I agree that neither decimal nor binary can represent values....
precisely. I was just referring to the conversion issues. If
we have decimal values to start with, and want decimal results,
why not do the math in decimal? We can certainly afford the
memory and speed hits with todays hardware.
So switching to precision as displayed is too difficult for you?
As for arbitrary precision arithmetic, there are several widely and
freely available libraries that provide it, but Microsoft couldn't use
'em because they're licensed under terms Microsoft can't stomach. And
given their track record, I know I wouldn't trust Microsoft to roll
their own and get it right.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Glaring Excel calc bug.
- From: ato_zee
- Re: Glaring Excel calc bug.
- References:
- Glaring Excel calc bug.
- From: baobob
- Re: Glaring Excel calc bug.
- From: Earl Kiosterud
- Re: Glaring Excel calc bug.
- From: Jerry W. Lewis
- Re: Glaring Excel calc bug.
- From: Earl Kiosterud
- Glaring Excel calc bug.
- Prev by Date: Re: Conditional Formatting Excel 2007
- Next by Date: viewing problem in Excel
- Previous by thread: Re: Glaring Excel calc bug.
- Next by thread: Re: Glaring Excel calc bug.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|