Re: IRR Function
- From: vandenberg p <pavberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 17:35:51 +0000 (UTC)
Hello:
Just to make things even more confusing we have something called the APR
which is reported on loan documents. This rate is computed ignoring the
the inter-year compounding. Lenders have "advertised" this rate as being
the "true" rate. Thus if you pay 1.5% per month the lender will report the
APR as 18% (12*.015), but the effective rate is (1.015)^12-1, closer to 19.6%
Pieter Vandenberg
Harlan Grove <hrlngrv@xxxxxxx> wrote:
: Ron Rosenfeld wrote...
: ...
:>However, simple mathematics shows that if you take the 11.96% (actually
:>11.9552927760608%), divide it by 24 to get 0.498137199002532% and apply that
:>interest rate sequentially to the cash flows posted by the OP, you obtain the
:>final result that he posted. To me that means I am earning an effective rate
:>of 11.96% annually, or .498% per period.
: Your terminology is wrong. Your 11.96% annual rate is *not* an
: _effective_ rate, it's nominal annual compounded semimonthly. The
: _effective_ rate is what joeu2... said it was,
: (1 + 0.00498137199002532) ^ 24 - 1 = 12.67% (rounded)
: That said, simple interest is the first order power series
: approximation for compound interest. Often it's close enough, but not
: always. If the question of interest here were whether the annual IRR
: exceeded 12%, simple interest and compound interest would give
: different results. Since IRR is only relevant to compound interest,
: exponentiation is always more appropriate for converting IRRs between
: different time periods.
.
- References:
- IRR Function
- From: StompS
- Re: IRR Function
- From: Ron Rosenfeld
- Re: IRR Function
- From: joeu2004
- Re: IRR Function
- From: Ron Rosenfeld
- Re: IRR Function
- From: Harlan Grove
- IRR Function
- Prev by Date: Re: Pivot Table - Select New Database Source
- Next by Date: Re: COUNTIF?
- Previous by thread: Re: IRR Function
- Next by thread: Save as .exe file
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|