Re: why>?
- From: "aaron.kempf@xxxxxxxxx" <aaron.kempf@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 29 May 2006 16:29:47 -0700
i tell you
internally; sql server can support huge numbers; so i dont accept your
claim.
much larger numbers than Excel can hold lol
it's not possible to verify spreadsheets. it is impossible to apply
software-development tools to excel-- and since 90% of the developers
at your company are 'spread*** developers' it is not practical to
double-check each and every formula, value and formatting.
i have worked on countless spread*** aggregation projects-- etl
technically-- and im sick and tired of working with a tool that doesn't
have
a) accurate, provable functions and formulas
b) accurate and strict data entry controls
c) portable method for transferring large amounts of data
excel is bloatware, a disease and an addiction.
outside consultants *** buddy i dont think that you have any idea how
much data i have permissions to. how much source; how many
applications.
i find it laughable that you talk to a database person like a junior--
WE MOVE MORE NUMBERS IN AN HOUR THAN YOU DO IN A WEEK
I just find it funny harlan.
there shoudln't be a market for excel inside or outside of any company.
it shouldn't be used for balancing a checkbook.
it shouldn't be used for forecasting / budgeting.
it's just not powerful enough to do the simple tasks well enough.
data entry, validation; portability-- CONNECTIONS to other data.
it's just the wrong tool for 99.999% of the situations where it is
used...
-Aaron
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: why>?
- From: Harlan Grove
- Re: why>?
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: VBA to add and remove text within cells
- Next by Date: Re: Time Calculation
- Previous by thread: Re: why>?
- Next by thread: Re: why>?
- Index(es):