Re: A pathetic question
- From: "Ken Wright" <ken.wright@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 16:48:45 +0100
Hi Alan - Cribbed from a post some time ago that Tom answered:-
[Quote]
What is there to explain? If you export a module as a file, then look at
the file size, it if it greater than 64KB, then, based on Rob's experience
and that of others, one may experience strange problems with the
application.
Since this is not a documented restriction, it would be hard to definitively
say what the exact restrictions are, but I would suggest that as a rule of
thumb, regardless of the type of module, keep the size to less than 64 KB.
--
Regards,
Tom Ogilvy
Stuart <sg_booth@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ucqGC#ZaDHA.2928@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Within the last day or so Rob Bovey replied to an OP
> and included the comment that (sic) "a module should
> not exceed 64kb" ( I think that's what was said).
>
> Would someone be kind enough to explain the reasons
> behind this advice, please?
>
> Would this apply to all modules (Standard, Class etc),
> and would this equally apply to AddIns?
>
> Regards.
[/quote]
Regards
Ken...................
"Alan Beban" <unavailable@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:O23dweYqFHA.3520@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Don Guillett wrote:
>> By all means, remove the empty modules and organize as desired. Just
>> don't
>> put too many procedures in one module. . . .
>
> Why is that?
>
> Alan Beban
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A pathetic question
- From: Alan Beban
- Re: A pathetic question
- References:
- A pathetic question
- From: Mike W
- Re: A pathetic question
- From: Don Guillett
- Re: A pathetic question
- From: Alan Beban
- A pathetic question
- Prev by Date: Re: Macro and user created button Question?
- Next by Date: Re: validation
- Previous by thread: Re: A pathetic question
- Next by thread: Re: A pathetic question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|