Re: very simple logical

That is a tremendously unhelpful reply.

If you want continued help, you would do well to explain *why* the
solution was incorrect.

In article <nowfal.1sy66s_1122667520.7205@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
nowfal <nowfal.1sy66s_1122667520.7205@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> That is not correct. thanks for quick response.
.

Loading