Re: Row/Column 0 (zero) for titles
From: Arvi Laanemets (garbage_at_hot.ee)
Date: 03/04/05
- Next message: Roger Govier: "Re: Insert $ to make address absolute"
- Previous message: uriel78: "Re: Definition of a statistical function (CQC) in Excel"
- In reply to: jrskurbe: "Row/Column 0 (zero) for titles"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 08:23:34 +0200
Hi
You can define your named ranged dynamic - so they will adjust automatically
whenever you add/remove rows or columns.
-- When sending mail, use address arvil<at>tarkon.ee Arvi Laanemets "jrskurbe" <jrskurbe@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:C146F759-9B8D-49BC-A1BE-0C47F653D3F1@microsoft.com... > A problem with some functions in Excel is if you include a title row/column, > you can't use functions like $A:$A, which are very useful if you have to > import varied data. Did Microsoft ever consider creating a "Row 0" or Column > "0" where you can add a title row but not have the formulas affected? I ran > into trouble with this when writing a combination HLOOKUP/MATCH formula. > Since HLOOKUP wants the first row of values in order, and the first row was > the titles, I was forced to place a range in the formula. Since I cut and > paste data frequently to analyze the data, named ranges aren't a good option > since I would constantly have to adjust them. > > Please let me know what you think... > > Thanks, > -Jason.
- Next message: Roger Govier: "Re: Insert $ to make address absolute"
- Previous message: uriel78: "Re: Definition of a statistical function (CQC) in Excel"
- In reply to: jrskurbe: "Row/Column 0 (zero) for titles"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]