Re: Degradation of performance : upgrading from Excel 2000 to Excel 20
- From: "NickHK" <TungCheWah@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 10:06:23 +0800
Well, you have various responses; make of them what you will.
It would seem though, that upgrading for functionality may be worthwhile,
but not for performance.
NickHK
"ecanet" <ecanet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:46649B7E-C9ED-4DC4-9BCF-469C366E9831@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi all,and
I know everyone is looking for latest version, but I work as a developer
my customer use Excel 2000. He asked me to evaluate the cost of an upgradeto
Excel 2003, so here I am.set
My program must fill 5000*255 cells.
I use the VBA method "Resize" to select all the range, then "Value" and
them with an array containing all the datas.
AFAIK, this is the most effective way to do this.
The problem I have is about the performances :
this code works both on Excel 2000 and on Excel 2003 but on the same
computer respectively need 3 sec and 9 sec.
This difference is not acceptable by my customer.
Could anyone tell me if this lack of perf is a known issue when upgrading
and if there is a workaround ?
I see on the net that this is a computer problem, but I'm afraid that they
wouldn't change their hardware for more competitive ones.....
Thanks for giving me any pointers and have a nice day !
Manu, hope I made myself clear enough, I'm not a good english speaker !
.
- Prev by Date: Re: help
- Next by Date: Re: More efficient way for macro to run on multipe files?
- Previous by thread: Re: Degradation of performance : upgrading from XL2000 to XL2003
- Next by thread: Re: VBA code to toggle hiding a serie (and relative legend) in a chart
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|