Re: Declaration problem
- From: Simon Murphy <Simon.Murphy.1u98mc_1124863523.8713@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 00:38:21 -0500
David
Longs are the native size and therefore more effecient than ints on 32
bit machines. Well (slightly) faster anyway, memory is the same I
think.
You can keep it as an int if you do the 38000-8000 shuffle (which lets
vb know one of the args is a long). This therefore does not affect
your declaration of x.
You are right, it is odd, I'm sure I read about this a long time ago,
no idea where though. It looks like the issue is still there in .net
if thats any consolation.
cheers
Simon
--
Simon Murphy
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Simon Murphy's Profile: http://www.excelforum.com/member.php?action=getinfo&userid=26538
View this thread: http://www.excelforum.com/showthread.php?threadid=398008
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Declaration problem
- From: davidm
- Re: Declaration problem
- References:
- Declaration problem
- From: davidm
- Re: Declaration problem
- From: Simon Murphy
- Re: Declaration problem
- From: davidm
- Re: Declaration problem
- From: Simon Murphy
- Re: Declaration problem
- From: davidm
- Declaration problem
- Prev by Date: Re: Need help with List Box setup construction in Excel
- Next by Date: Re: how do i autorefresh a datasource every 5 seconds in Excel?
- Previous by thread: Re: Declaration problem
- Next by thread: Re: Declaration problem
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|