Re: Basic question - modules and class modules - what's the difference?
- From: JE McGimpsey <jemcgimpsey@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 07 May 2005 09:01:47 -0600
Personally, I'd stick with deko's analysis, since he said "most people".
I'd guess that the fraction of users of XL that have ever used a
non-standard object is less than 1%, and the fraction who've actually
created a "business function object" infinitesimally smaller.
The overwhelming majority of workbooks in the wild don't even contain a
*formula*!
In article <eHEytFxUFHA.2124@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Bob Phillips" <phillips@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Excel provides all the
> > objects most people need, so rarely will you need to create you own class
> > modules.
>
> That's not true Deko. Excel provides most of the Excel objects, methods and
> properties that we need (not all!), but they provide not business function
> objects, so we need to create those. Class modules are ideal for that.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Appending Data from one *** to a master ***
- Next by Date: Re: Command Button text changes size
- Previous by thread: Re: Basic question - modules and class modules - what's the difference?
- Next by thread: Re: Basic question - modules and class modules - what's the difference?
- Index(es):