Re: Length limitation of cell formulas
- From: "Tom Ogilvy" <twogilvy@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 11:21:17 -0400
that just caused an error on the first message box. (xl2003). The formula
was truncated to 1023 characters. what is the significance of 5489. It
appears the limit is 1024 as stated in help. If you do a recalc, you will
see the truncated formula isn't functional (it isn't secretly working as it
appears you are trying to imply).
--
Regards,
Tom Ogilvy
"Peter T" <peter_t@discussions> wrote in message
news:eTlBEZbRFHA.3144@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> typo:
>
> > ...length of 5489:
> should read
> length of 5849
>
> Peter T
>
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Length limitation of cell formulas
- From: Barmaley
- Re: Length limitation of cell formulas
- From: Peter T
- Re: Length limitation of cell formulas
- References:
- Length limitation of cell formulas
- From: Paul O. Schenker
- Re: Length limitation of cell formulas
- From: Peter T
- Re: Length limitation of cell formulas
- From: Peter T
- Re: Length limitation of cell formulas
- From: Peter T
- Length limitation of cell formulas
- Prev by Date: Re: Convert, export, or save Word as an image file (jpg, gif, png, etc
- Next by Date: Re: finding the number of rows and the first row with a specific value
- Previous by thread: Re: Length limitation of cell formulas
- Next by thread: Re: Length limitation of cell formulas
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading