Re: Why?
From: Trevor Shuttleworth (Trevor_at_Shucks.demon.co.uk)
Date: 10/07/04
- Next message: Frank Kabel: "Re: Help with a formula"
- Previous message: Dan Haydon: "Re: Help with a formula"
- In reply to: hmmm: "Why?"
- Next in thread: Debra Dalgleish: "Re: Why?"
- Reply: Debra Dalgleish: "Re: Why?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 22:45:13 +0100
And just to add to the replies ...
it seems that the questions that don't get answered are few and far between.
I enjoy contributing to the forum but, more often than not, questions
actually appear with answers already posted.
I've seen dozens if not hundreds of questions answered where I didn't even
understand the question. The question has been read, digested, interpreted
and solutions coded in a matter of minutes ... often with variations
depending on what the OP might have meant.
I think the questions looked upon most favourably are those where the OP
explains the problem clearly, gives a (text) sample of the data and the
expected results AND ideally the code or function they have tried to create.
"hmmm" <hmmm@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:D843AACD-A80D-40C1-A996-2D18BD4B72A4@microsoft.com...
> Why is it that some questions on here get answered and others don't?
- Next message: Frank Kabel: "Re: Help with a formula"
- Previous message: Dan Haydon: "Re: Help with a formula"
- In reply to: hmmm: "Why?"
- Next in thread: Debra Dalgleish: "Re: Why?"
- Reply: Debra Dalgleish: "Re: Why?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|