Re: Graphing points to the 10^-19

Tech Tip: Click here to run a free scan for Windows Errors and optimize PC performance



Yes thank you, it is a software issue. I thought I was doing something wrong
/ human error in inputing data or formatting the graph.

I hope this bug gets fixed because I'd rather not get another version of
excel and I might need to graph data with numbers this small again.

Anyway to get automatically notified should a patch for this bug gets issued?
Thanks for all the responses/help.


"Jon Peltier" wrote:

Without doing anything special, I created a chart and added a trendline. It
worked as expected, and I got this formula:

y = -2.3507E-18x + 5.4943E-19
R2 = 9.9921E-01

This worked the same in Excel 2000 and in 2003. Then I tried it in Excel
2007 and it failed in the same manner that you described. The Y axis only
showed 0.0000E00 at the bottom, and no more values, and the formula showed Y
= 5.4943E-19, omitting the constant. Excel apparently thought this was a
rounding error and coerced it to zero. I ran a set of trials where I
multiplied the Y values of each trial by ten to get the Y values for the
next. My regression formulas looked like:

y = 5.49429E-19 [R² = 9.99213E-01]

y = 5.49429E-18 [R² = 9.99213E-01]

y = 5.49429E-17 [R² = 9.99213E-01]

y = 5.49429E-16 [R² = 9.99213E-01]

y = -2.35066E-14x [R² = 9.99213E-01]

y = -2.35066E-13x + 5.49429E-14 [R² = 9.99213E-01]

y = -2.35066E-12x + 5.49429E-13 [R² = 9.99213E-01]

y = -2.35066E-11x + 5.49429E-12 [R² = 9.99213E-01]


The first formula came from your example. Note that the constant has the
same pre-exponential factor for all of the formulas (5.49429) except for the
case when it would be 5.49429E-15, which sounds like a threshold for being
considered a rounding error. In all cases where the coefficient of X wasn't
ignored, the coefficient's pre-exponential factor was the same (-2.35066),
and in all cases, R² was the same (0.999213). I repeated this in Excel 2003,
and the formulas were identical except for the exponents of the fitting
constants.

I'd classify this one more as a bug than as a feature.

- Jon
-------
Jon Peltier, Microsoft Excel MVP
Tutorials and Custom Solutions
http://PeltierTech.com
_______


"Lala" <Lala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:BBBD75D9-D132-47FF-9BBC-2F4E5D98107F@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Yes the graph choosen is the xy scatter graph. The values I'm trying to
graph
are :
x = 0.1111 y= 2.872*10^-19 ; (2.872E-19 when actually posting in the cell)
x = 0.0625 y= 4.043*10^-19 ; (4.043E-19)
x = 0.0400 y= 4.576*10^-19 ; (4.576E-19)
x = 0.0277 y= 4.814*10^-19 ; (4.814E-19)

Again the Y values of (1E-19 to 6E-19) are not posting, only 0 value is
posting.
When editing the y axis the minimum value on automatic is 0 and the
maximum
does say 6.0E-19. But on the actual agraph I don't see these values. So
when
doing a line graph I only get a linear equation of y=5E-19 instead of
y=mx+b.

Excel does graph the data points and when adding data labels, the values
appear. It's just the division values (1.00E-19 to 6.00E-19) on the y axis
that doesn't appear.

I've also tried setting the cells to scientific numbers, general and
numbers
but that didn't help.

It has to be the program because I've had 2 people graph my data and it
worked on their software.

"Bernard Liengme" wrote:

It would be helpful to see at least 5 data points (both the x and the y
values): could you list them for us?
Are you sure you have made an XY chart and not a Line chart?
If you wish you may send me a file with the data
best wishes
--
Bernard V Liengme
www.stfx.ca/people/bliengme
remove caps from email

"Lala" <Lala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:972F4E9D-ACB5-4371-BE51-48541F2D5B2B@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I have the home and student 2007 version. When graphing a scatter graph
with
the Y axis having 10 to the negative power, excel doesn't show the
values
on
the y axis. It only shows the 0 intercept value. I've tried editing the
axis
values but the number still doesn't display and excel automatically
puts
the
number to at least 10 decimal places, ie 5.000000000000001E-19.

When I just click automatic, the right values appear in the edit menu
but
the y values still won't show on the actual graph. So when doing a
trendline
the equation doesn't show an m slope value, ie y=5E-19. A friend
graphed
my
data on an older version excel and it graphed it properly with the
proper
y
values displaying, and linear trendline equation was in right format of
y
=
mx + b, ie y= -2E-18x + 5E-19

Could my software be defective? Or are some features disabled?






.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Chart wizard funcitonality in Excel 2007?
    ... myself making the same bar graph with a secondary axis line graph. ... give us the 03 chart wizard as a downloadable add in. ... I've been using Excel for ...
    (microsoft.public.excel.charting)
  • Re: Graphing points to the 10^-19
    ... Bernard V Liengme ... Jon Peltier, Microsoft Excel MVP ... When editing the y axis the minimum value on automatic is 0 and the ...
    (microsoft.public.excel.charting)
  • Re: Expression for Blank Spaces
    ... Jon Peltier, Microsoft Excel MVP ... the graph and the x axis accomodates that. ... Col "C" formula out, line graph for C stops as desired, however, if I ... before all DOS applications become extinct, so I would like to convert to ...
    (microsoft.public.excel.charting)
  • Re: Help an Excel novice with a graph formula?
    ... An Excel chart can display more than just one data set (where "data set" ... for the Y axis. ... > line graph represents a percentile ranking. ...
    (microsoft.public.excel.misc)
  • Re: How do I remove series
    ... just formatting the cells as text will not correct this. ... visible and excel will interpret the years as text strings. ... The final result was supposed to show as a graph with the X axis showing the ...
    (microsoft.public.excel.newusers)