Re: Disappointment in VC++ .Net in VS2008
- From: David Lowndes <DavidL@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2007 21:35:36 +0000
Maybe I've just been too trusting however. In any case, you can quickly
discover if a class implements "IDisposable" by looking at its definition in
code (via the "GoToDefinition" command typically).
All this misses the simple fact that some developers (most likely the
target audience for C#) don't know about the using statement (or the
issue it solves).
I've been working on a mixed C# C++/CLI project for the last year and
have had to educate my colleagues to its existence despite being the
last man in on the C# code. Consequently we have loads of code that
probably ought to have using statements - but doesn't.
The issue of
"IDisposable" is nevertheless a very tiny one in the grand scheme of things.
I think it's actually quite a fundamental issue that the language has
such an unintuitive hole in it.
... C++ should have been used in the first place.
We agree on that :)
Merry Christmas
Dave
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Disappointment in VC++ .Net in VS2008
- From: Edward Diener
- Re: Disappointment in VC++ .Net in VS2008
- References:
- Disappointment in VC++ .Net in VS2008
- From: Edward Diener
- Re: Disappointment in VC++ .Net in VS2008
- From: Larry Smith
- Re: Disappointment in VC++ .Net in VS2008
- From: David Lowndes
- Re: Disappointment in VC++ .Net in VS2008
- From: Larry Smith
- Re: Disappointment in VC++ .Net in VS2008
- From: David Lowndes
- Re: Disappointment in VC++ .Net in VS2008
- From: Larry Smith
- Re: Disappointment in VC++ .Net in VS2008
- From: David Lowndes
- Re: Disappointment in VC++ .Net in VS2008
- From: Larry Smith
- Disappointment in VC++ .Net in VS2008
- Prev by Date: Re: Disappointment in VC++ .Net in VS2008
- Next by Date: Re: Disappointment in VC++ .Net in VS2008
- Previous by thread: Re: Disappointment in VC++ .Net in VS2008
- Next by thread: Re: Disappointment in VC++ .Net in VS2008
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|