Re: passing std::string from visual studio 2005 to an C++ DLL generated by VC 6.0
- From: David Wilkinson <no-reply@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 08:00:58 -0400
Mihai N. wrote:
Well, exposing a pure interface also gives binary compatibility while preserving OO style.I have never tried that one, sounds interesting, I might take a look.
But I think I can understand why that would work ...
Mihai:
It has to work, because that is what COM does.
--
David Wilkinson
Visual C++ MVP
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- passing std::string from visual studio 2005 to an C++ DLL generated by VC 6.0
- From: Creativ
- Re: passing std::string from visual studio 2005 to an C++ DLL generated by VC 6.0
- From: David Wilkinson
- Re: passing std::string from visual studio 2005 to an C++ DLL generated by VC 6.0
- From: Ben Voigt [C++ MVP]
- Re: passing std::string from visual studio 2005 to an C++ DLL generated by VC 6.0
- From: Mihai N.
- Re: passing std::string from visual studio 2005 to an C++ DLL generated by VC 6.0
- From: Ben Voigt [C++ MVP]
- Re: passing std::string from visual studio 2005 to an C++ DLL generated by VC 6.0
- From: Mihai N.
- Re: passing std::string from visual studio 2005 to an C++ DLL generated by VC 6.0
- From: Ben Voigt [C++ MVP]
- Re: passing std::string from visual studio 2005 to an C++ DLL generated by VC 6.0
- From: Mihai N.
- passing std::string from visual studio 2005 to an C++ DLL generated by VC 6.0
- Prev by Date: Re: Errors in VC.Net porting
- Next by Date: Re: VS2005 : Managed Wrapper for Unmanaged code : Ellipsis dilema
- Previous by thread: Re: passing std::string from visual studio 2005 to an C++ DLL generated by VC 6.0
- Next by thread: Re: passing std::string from visual studio 2005 to an C++ DLL generated by VC 6.0
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|