Re: "Poll" Has C# Generally Replaced C++


"Andre Kaufmann" <andre.kaufmann.bei@xxxxxxxxxxx> skrev i meddelandet
news:efotRbaAGHA.2708@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Bo Persson wrote:
>> "Greg" <gm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> skrev i meddelandet
>> news:A3A79B86-C3DF-4FDB-8E2B-9033B9D56177@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> [...]
> >> IMHO C++ - C++/CLI and C# can be used very effectively together
> >> and
> >> both ...
>> That is actually 3 languages, not 2.
>>
>> C++/CLI is not even close to the language called ISO C++. It just
>> looks similar, just like Java does.
>
> C++/CLI is an extension to C++, therefore a C++/CLI compiler must be
> able to compile standard C++.

No, it does not.

There are some extensions, but also some parts that are missing, and
some parts that just behave differently.

> So I think it's equally true to speak of 2 and/or of 3 languages.
> ;-)

Let's disagree. :-)

Bo Persson


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Unicode Basic Latin and Latin-1 coverage of Western Europe
    ... ::: Its isn't as easy as east and west anymore! ... ::: Bo persson ... :: Meaning which languages? ...
    (microsoft.public.vc.mfc)
  • Re: Basic inheritance question
    ... used 'this' in C++ and Java. ... but in Python it doesn't. ... you meant "in languages that has implicit instance reference available in methods"? ...
    (comp.lang.python)
  • Re: Looking for programming examples in any programming language
    ... in an in-page applet. ... do that for such a broad range of languages. ... But note even Java applets ... If you're going to separate the specific I/O environment from ...
    (comp.programming)
  • Re: parser
    ... and by no means is Java some obscure language... ... but I still feel that both C and C++ are good languages to use for ... leaving the backend interpreter/JIT as a simpler piece of machinery). ... that you believe that C lacks the ability to build parsers as masses of tiny ...
    (comp.programming)
  • Re: OO compilers and efficiency
    ... > will be difficult for a compiler to do a good job of spotting when the OO ... "simpler" languages, ... I agree that Java ... (including adding lexical closures) ...
    (comp.programming)