Re: Is There Any Reason to Even Use VC++ Anymore?
- From: "Willy Denoyette [MVP]" <willy.denoyette@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 20:25:32 +0100
"Peter Oliphant" <poliphant@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ulmaj6o%23FHA.272@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>I never did any benchmarks, so I was basing my statement on other reports.
>Thus I believe your findings more than what I've read (even though,
>ironically, all I've done is read what you've said in saying this...lol).
>So speed is not a selling point.
>
> Still, I prefer to use C++ over C#, probably just because I prefer (am
> more familiar with) the syntax. And, I'm afraid of seeing this pop up one
> day on the MS website:
>
> "MS has deprecated C++ in favor of C#". <shiver>
>
C++ != C++/CLI remember!
What's possible is that you may see "MS has deprecated C++/CLI in favor of
C#", but they would never deprecate the language (native C++) they use to
build >95% of their products.
Willy.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is There Any Reason to Even Use VC++ Anymore?
- From: Peter Oliphant
- Re: Is There Any Reason to Even Use VC++ Anymore?
- References:
- Re: Is There Any Reason to Even Use VC++ Anymore?
- From: Herby
- Re: Is There Any Reason to Even Use VC++ Anymore?
- From: Peter Oliphant
- Re: Is There Any Reason to Even Use VC++ Anymore?
- From: Willy Denoyette [MVP]
- Re: Is There Any Reason to Even Use VC++ Anymore?
- From: Peter Oliphant
- Re: Is There Any Reason to Even Use VC++ Anymore?
- Prev by Date: Re: passing & filling string class variables
- Next by Date: Re: Is There Any Reason to Even Use VC++ Anymore?
- Previous by thread: Re: Is There Any Reason to Even Use VC++ Anymore?
- Next by thread: Re: Is There Any Reason to Even Use VC++ Anymore?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|