Re: "pointers" in /clr
- From: "William DePalo [MVP VC++ ]" <willd.no.spam@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 15:33:26 -0500
"beginthreadex" <beginthreadex@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:OWyz22h6FHA.3976@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Syntax like this in anything that's called C++ is so frustrating. What you
> have below is just garbage ... and I wish Microsoft would collect it.
That's one opinion. Here is another:
If one's goal is to develop a native application in standard C++ then the
new syntax is beside the point as it will not be present.
On the other hand, if one targets a platform whose objects are allowed to
move around in memory without the knowledge or consent of the developer or
his language, then it is unreasonable to assume that the standard language,
which makes no provision for such movement, will be expressive enough
without changes.
Regards,
Will
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: "pointers" in /clr
- From: beginthreadex
- Re: "pointers" in /clr
- References:
- "pointers" in /clr
- From: Peter Oliphant
- Re: "pointers" in /clr
- From: Nishant Sivakumar
- Re: "pointers" in /clr
- From: beginthreadex
- "pointers" in /clr
- Prev by Date: Re: "pointers" in /clr
- Next by Date: Re: "pointers" in /clr
- Previous by thread: Re: "pointers" in /clr
- Next by thread: Re: "pointers" in /clr
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|