Re: Conversion from 2003 to 2005 just too hard
- From: "Holger Grund" <holger.grund@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2005 15:03:58 +0100
"Carl Daniel [VC++ MVP]" <cpdaniel_remove_this_and_nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote
>> the form Point _gc[]'), but how do I find out the details to it? Will a
>> method that has a parameter of the form "Point __gc[] point" work if I
>> give it something defined like this:
>>
>> array<Point^>^ point
>
> Yes, they're exactly the same type, one spelled in the old syntax, the
> other in the new syntax.
>
Umh, unless I'm missing something these don't match because you
have another level of indirection here.
I guess it should be array<Point>^ point (I'm too lazy to look it up, but
I would design Point as a value type).
Otherwise it should have been
Point* [] point
in the first place.
-hg
.
- References:
- Conversion from 2003 to 2005 just too hard
- From: Peter Oliphant
- Re: Conversion from 2003 to 2005 just too hard
- From: Arnaud Debaene
- Conversion from 2003 to 2005 just too hard
- Prev by Date: Re: Conversion from 2003 to 2005 just too hard
- Next by Date: Re: Manifests and VC8
- Previous by thread: Re: Conversion from 2003 to 2005 just too hard
- Next by thread: Re: Conversion from 2003 to 2005 just too hard
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
