Re: Unmanaged Visual C++ 2005 questions
- From: Wil <Wil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 11:15:03 -0700
I suppose I misinterpreted Scoble's remarks in
http://channel9.msdn.com/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=72074
> The parts of Avalon that Longhorn relies on are not managed, as far as I know.
Maybe I was assuming that Longhorn "relies on" more of Avalon than it
actually does, since (originally) Avalon, Indigo, and WinFS were declared the
"Three Pillars of Longhorn". Now, apparently, it's less of a "pillar" than
an attached ornament? So how much of Avalon is written in C/C++, and how
much is written in C#? Anyway, the part of Avalon that Longhorn **does**
rely on is unmanaged, it seems. And of course, as you say the code base of
Longhorn is itself unmanaged, since it's built starting with Windows 2003.
It will be a long time, if ever, before Windows is unmanaged code, I'm sure
we all agree. If that made sense, then Solaris would be written in Java.
Wil
.
- References:
- Unmanaged Visual C++ 2005 questions
- From: Olaf Baeyens
- RE: Unmanaged Visual C++ 2005 questions
- From: Wil
- Re: Unmanaged Visual C++ 2005 questions
- From: Carl Daniel [VC++ MVP]
- Unmanaged Visual C++ 2005 questions
- Prev by Date: Re: Whats the Deal with Visual C++.Net?
- Next by Date: Re: Whats the Deal with Visual C++.Net?
- Previous by thread: Re: Unmanaged Visual C++ 2005 questions
- Next by thread: Refreshing a progressBar
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading