Re: Array of class and a pointer to it

Tech-Archive recommends: Fix windows errors by optimizing your registry


> No, the above line is invalid.
> and this line is also invalid.
Hi Brian,
thanks to pointing that out. I am sorry for that advice.
> Ah, but that's not the same, is it? You have created an array of pointers,
> not a two-dimensional array, which is what the OP wants.
I think you are wrong on that. There is physically no such thing as a 2
dimentional array in the memory. It is array of pointers to pointers. The
first operator[] take the pointer to the array of values the second
operator[] takes the value.
With best regards,
Boni


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Q: Checking the size of a non-allocated array?
    ... an actual argument is already invalid ... First note that you don't have an unallocated array in the subroutine. ... it is comparable to disassociated or undefined pointers. ... Obviously the compiler has ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • Re: Differance between Array and Pointers
    ... Well, except that arrays tend to be much larger than pointers, and the ... An array is a contiguous region of memory containing N elements of M ... indexing vs. a loop). ...
    (comp.arch.embedded)
  • [RFCv2][PATCH] flexible array implementation
    ... I call it a flexible array. ... storage for pointers to the second level. ... all locking must be provided by the caller. ... make sure to pass in &ptr instead of ptr. ...
    (Linux-Kernel)
  • [RFC][PATCH] flexible array implementation v4
    ... I call it a flexible array. ... so never does an order>0 allocation. ... storage for pointers to the second level. ... all locking must be provided by the caller. ...
    (Linux-Kernel)
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH] flexible array implementation v4
    ... I call it a flexible array. ... so never does an order>0 allocation. ... storage for pointers to the second level. ... all locking must be provided by the caller. ...
    (Linux-Kernel)