Re: out equivalent in MC++
From: Daniel P. (danutzp1_at_hotmail.comU)
Date: 03/19/04
- Next message: Jonathan Payne: "Re: Add MFC Class CObject fails"
- Previous message: Bill Roper: "Add MFC Class CObject fails"
- In reply to: Tomas Restrepo \(MVP\): "Re: out equivalent in MC++"
- Next in thread: at work: "Re: out equivalent in MC++"
- Reply: at work: "Re: out equivalent in MC++"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 10:30:01 -0600
Hi Tomas,
Yes, you are right but I'm just tired of learning every small detail of a
Microsoft technology just to discover after 2-3 years that it was thrown
away by MS and replaced with something more "cool".
I've spent a lot money and time learning about COM just to use it a couple
of times. Now, COM is (almost) dead, long live .NET, and so on.
I made the decision to learn more about C++, Object Oriented Analysis and
Design, UML, Rational Unified Process and other knowledge areas that are
tehcnology independend.
BTW: I went recently to a meeting with Bjarne Stroustrup and in less than 2
hours I discovered that after 10 years of C++ I still have a lot to learn.
The guy talked about function objects (functors) and generic programming.
"Tomas Restrepo (MVP)" <tomasr@mvps.org> wrote in message
news:u4eLbRVDEHA.3064@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> Hi Danil,
>
> > Yeah, when I answered I was thinking at the standard C++.
> >
> > Anyway I do not see why anyone would use
> > > System::Runtime::InteropServices::OutAttribute attribute.
> >
> > when it can use a reference or a pointer unless it has to write a piece
of
> > code that needs to work with C# and it this case probably it will use
your
> > solution.
>
> Ahh, that ;) Well, explicitness would be one reason (and if you're writing
> managed code, then you *should* be thinking about how things are going to
> look from the outside, or at least that's my opinion).
>
> --
> Tomas Restrepo
> tomasr@mvps.org
>
>
- Next message: Jonathan Payne: "Re: Add MFC Class CObject fails"
- Previous message: Bill Roper: "Add MFC Class CObject fails"
- In reply to: Tomas Restrepo \(MVP\): "Re: out equivalent in MC++"
- Next in thread: at work: "Re: out equivalent in MC++"
- Reply: at work: "Re: out equivalent in MC++"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
