Re: Translate C# to VB.NET
- From: "Michael C" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 23:26:43 +1100
"Herfried K. Wagner [MVP]" <hirf-spam-me-here@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:OuibQFLjJHA.4276@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
'WithEvents'/'Handles' are declarative, whereas '+='/'AddHandler' are
imperative.
I think you're getting a little academic there. :-) The point is VB has 3
ways to do something yet C# does it all the same way. Doesn't that make C#
more consistant?
BTW, this is the sort of thing I don't like about VB, they try to make
things easier by adding some keywords or method that supposedly makes it
easier but they generally just end up muddying the waters and making it so
there is more to learn.
Michael
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Translate C# to VB.NET
- From: Cor Ligthert[MVP]
- Re: Translate C# to VB.NET
- References:
- Translate C# to VB.NET
- From: dwm
- Re: Translate C# to VB.NET
- From: Chris Dunaway
- Re: Translate C# to VB.NET
- From: Cor Ligthert[MVP]
- Re: Translate C# to VB.NET
- From: Michael C
- Re: Translate C# to VB.NET
- From: Cor Ligthert[MVP]
- Re: Translate C# to VB.NET
- From: Michael C
- Re: Translate C# to VB.NET
- From: Cor Ligthert[MVP]
- Re: Translate C# to VB.NET
- From: Michael C
- Re: Translate C# to VB.NET
- From: Michael D. Ober
- Re: Translate C# to VB.NET
- From: Michael C
- Re: Translate C# to VB.NET
- From: Michael D. Ober
- Re: Translate C# to VB.NET
- From: Michael C
- Re: Translate C# to VB.NET
- From: Herfried K. Wagner [MVP]
- Re: Translate C# to VB.NET
- From: Michael C
- Re: Translate C# to VB.NET
- From: Herfried K. Wagner [MVP]
- Translate C# to VB.NET
- Prev by Date: Problems with CopytoDataTable() after a query in linq
- Next by Date: Re: Translate C# to VB.NET
- Previous by thread: Re: Translate C# to VB.NET
- Next by thread: Re: Translate C# to VB.NET
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|