Re: Success of VB
- From: Spam Catcher <spamhoneypot@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 05:23:41 GMT
"Cor Ligthert [MVP]" <notmyfirstname@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:e0tWE1ckHHA.5084@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
I like this sentence from the article.
80% of C# programmers are good, while 80% of VB programmers are not good.
This means that there are in fact confirm the writter much more good VB
programmers than C# programmers in absolute figurs.
I guess it's because VB is easier to pick up ... hence it attracts less
skilled developers.
I found this to be the case with classic VB developers who pick up VB.NET.
They assume VB.NET is the same as VB6 ... and they end up writing horrid
non-OO code.
However, if you get someone who is comfortable in an OO environment
(Java/C#/C++, etc)... VB.NET, C#, etc won't really make a difference.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Success of VB
- From: aaron.kempf@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Success of VB
- From: Herfried K. Wagner [MVP]
- Re: Success of VB
- References:
- Success of VB
- From: Nicholas M. Makin
- Re: Success of VB
- From: sloan
- Re: Success of VB
- From: Cor Ligthert [MVP]
- Success of VB
- Prev by Date: Re: Express VB2005 vs. VB2003
- Next by Date: Re: Success of VB
- Previous by thread: Re: Success of VB
- Next by thread: Re: Success of VB
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|