Re: Is VB Caca??
- From: "Branco Medeiros" <branco.medeiros@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 20 Mar 2007 08:31:07 -0700
Tom Leylan wrote (in a response to Herfried):
<snip>
Frankly I don't see the
syntactic advantage to Sub at all, they can as easily be declared as
functions that return Nothing.
I have an idea you will tell me why your changes make perfect sense and mine
are going too far. :-)
Considering that Nothing isn't a type at all (just the value of a
given type), having something like
Function SomeFunction() As Nothing
....
End Function
would be unfair competition with "MustInherit", "NotInheritable" and
family (in the bogus design category)... =))))
Regards,
B.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is VB Caca??
- From: Michael D. Ober
- Re: Is VB Caca??
- From: Tom Leylan
- Re: Is VB Caca??
- References:
- Is VB Caca??
- From: Don
- Re: Is VB Caca??
- From: Göran Andersson
- Re: Is VB Caca??
- From: RobinS
- Re: Is VB Caca??
- From: Tom Leylan
- Re: Is VB Caca??
- From: Tony K
- Re: Is VB Caca??
- From: Tom Leylan
- Re: Is VB Caca??
- From: CodeMonkey
- Re: Is VB Caca??
- From: Tom Leylan
- Re: Is VB Caca??
- From: Herfried K. Wagner [MVP]
- Re: Is VB Caca??
- From: Tom Leylan
- Re: Is VB Caca??
- From: Herfried K. Wagner [MVP]
- Re: Is VB Caca??
- From: Tom Leylan
- Is VB Caca??
- Prev by Date: Re: Good answer
- Next by Date: Re: How to fix this String to Long Error??
- Previous by thread: Re: Is VB Caca??
- Next by thread: Re: Is VB Caca??
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading