Re: Is VB Caca??

Tech Tip: Click here to run a free scan for Windows Errors and optimize PC performance



Just to concur and to re-inforce something I mentioned earlier...

In VB.NET, you will know what potential compilation errors await you as soon
as you move off the line you just typed. With Option Strict set to On (not
the default), there really isn't too much left to chance when it comes to
the dynamic compilation that VB.NET gives you on the fly.

But, with C#, you really MUST manually build your app. to see what problems
you have. Many complilation issues will not show up at all automatically in
C#.


"RobinS" <RobinS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Sf6dnStv6aSMRmDYnZ2dnUVZ_sapnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Then you are judging something of which you have no experience. I have
written a handful of apps in VB, then turned around and rewritten the same
applications in C# for the experience, and I can promise you, the
"auto-compile-as-you-type" function in VB is a *lot* more dynamic and
fully-functional than the one in C#.

Robin S.
-----------------------------------------------
"Göran Andersson" <guffa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:uyUctKbaHHA.4808@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cor Ligthert [MVP] wrote:
Goran,

You surely should try VB.Net once.

I regularly write small pieces of code in VB.NET to try them out. Not
enough to notice any difference in the background compilation, though.

There is some checking in C#, however for somebody who knows what VB.Net
does, it is really nothing.

As you have seen am I a not always a correct typer (but very quick), I
assume that I build a C# program at least 5 times more than a VB.Net
program.

I do mostly web development. I don't even have to build it to run it.

Cor

"Göran Andersson" <guffa@xxxxxxxxx> schreef in bericht
news:uwoecVZaHHA.1400@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Scott M. wrote:
Yes. That's how it works in C# too. Only as it's not line based, it
will also do the check if you pause for a second while typing a line.
No, Göran it's not. Not nearly to the extent that it is in VB .NET.
You are contradicting yourself. Either it is, or it is not. If it is
not, the extent of it can not be compared to something that is, which
you just did.

--
Göran Andersson
_____
http://www.guffa.com




--
Göran Andersson
_____
http://www.guffa.com




.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: VB6, VB2005, or Something Else?
    ... the original P-code was an instruction set for a "virtual Pascal" machine. ... having an interpreter at the core of an app makes it much easier to customize and extend. ... There are many routines that will run *very much faster* as a native code compiled exe than they do as a pcode compiled exe, and there are other routines in which it makes almost no differnce at all. ... I mean, come on, you can improve your compilation speed every time simply by using pcode instead of native code, and then when you are finally satisfied with your full application you can instead compile to native code and test it fully, fixing any little problems that might be caused by the change. ...
    (microsoft.public.vb.general.discussion)
  • RE: Application error in event log
    ... image is compiled by the .NET the first time that you load the assembly, ... This means that the image compilation failed. ... can not alter at runtime the config file (upon there are functions like ... At some point I got one of our network admins to run the app ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp)
  • Re: windows 95 RPC
    ... #error You need a Windows NT 4.0 or later to run this stub because it uses ... your C/C++ compilation flags indicate you intend to run this ... app on earlier systems. ...
    (microsoft.public.win32.programmer.networks)
  • Re: What programming language for Future
    ... > D is a pretty young language. ... app is being tweaked by an end user). ... all this is not really possible with static compilation. ... there is also a gcc implementation of ada. ...
    (comp.lang.misc)
  • Re: Easier Way to Conditional Compile?
    ... currently running in the IDE or not. ... >> and off with a conditional compilation argument during IDE development. ... >> the app, then go back in and change the value back. ... > then you can test for the underscore character anytime at run time to ...
    (microsoft.public.vb.general.discussion)