Re: Framework 2.0 array redim unsatisfactory performance
- From: "Tom Jastrzebski" <tom@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 01:24:39 GMT
Jay,
I just noticed something I thought was interesting and decided to write
about it, thinking that someone migrating from VB 6.0 may experience this
issue, regardless of what the root cause is and whether these environments
should be compared or not.
As I said, the only reason why I tried "array redim" was because I was
hoping to be nicely surprised - and I was not.
What I am looking for is dynamic data structure which has the least memory
overhead.
It seems like at some point I will have to develop my own. But that is OK,
it by no means diminish the value of .Net Framework.
To check process memory utilization I use:
Process.GetCurrentProcess().WorkingSet64
Peace,
Tomasz
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Framework 2.0 array redim unsatisfactory performance
- From: Jay B. Harlow [MVP - Outlook]
- Re: Framework 2.0 array redim unsatisfactory performance
- References:
- Framework 2.0 array redim unsatisfactory performance
- From: Tom Jastrzebski
- Re: Framework 2.0 array redim unsatisfactory performance
- From: Jay B. Harlow [MVP - Outlook]
- Re: Framework 2.0 array redim unsatisfactory performance
- From: Tom Jastrzebski
- Re: Framework 2.0 array redim unsatisfactory performance
- From: Jay B. Harlow [MVP - Outlook]
- Re: Framework 2.0 array redim unsatisfactory performance
- From: Tom Jastrzebski
- Re: Framework 2.0 array redim unsatisfactory performance
- From: Jay B. Harlow [MVP - Outlook]
- Framework 2.0 array redim unsatisfactory performance
- Prev by Date: Re: Events in a .NET thread
- Next by Date: Re: XP / VB6 accessing network mapped drives after restart
- Previous by thread: Re: Framework 2.0 array redim unsatisfactory performance
- Next by thread: Re: Framework 2.0 array redim unsatisfactory performance
- Index(es):