Re: VB Equivilents

Tech-Archive recommends: Fix windows errors by optimizing your registry

Speaking of which, is there an announced release date on VS 2005 yet? Will
it actually be in 2005? :o)

"Tom Shelton" <tom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:u1I9SCrSFHA.2432@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> In article <jtOdnbiWtZ8NXPPfRVn-rQ@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, OpticTygre wrote:
>> Heh...so much for the "Common" language runtime. And programmer's
>> choice.
>> lol. Oh well. I suppose Int64 could handle values needed by uint and
>> ulong.
>
> The CLR does support unsigned numbers, but the CTS does not. VB.NET
> does not allow you to violate the CTS yet (next version allows unsigned
> numbers).
>
> --
> Tom Shelton [MVP]


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: VB Equivilents
    ... I suppose Int64 could handle values needed by uint and ulong. ... The CLR does support unsigned numbers, but the CTS does not. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.vb)
  • Re: can anyont explain the diff between CTS and CLS in simple way ??
    ... if these compiler is targeting the CLR. ... So this given features are garanteed ... outside the CLS because members of this types might not be accessible by ... > The Common Type System (CTS) is the set of rules that state what data ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.clr)
  • Delphi.NET CLS compliance
    ... with the CLR there is a CTS (Common Type System) model for defining CLI ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: Ticks
    ... Rasika wrote: ... > Would it not have made more sense to use ulong rather than long for ... It wouldn't have been CTS or CLS compliant (one of the two - can't ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp)