Re: >115200 serial communication
From: alejandro lapeyre (alejandrolapeyre_at_jotmail.com)
Date: 01/24/05
- Next message: Zorpiedoman: "WindowsForm Resources"
- Previous message: steve: "installation woe(s)"
- In reply to: dast: ">115200 serial communication"
- Next in thread: *** Grier: "Re: >115200 serial communication"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 12:14:39 -0300
The original, classical, serial chips have that speed "limitation". I dont
know if the new motherboards include that functions with faster speeds. I
guess they dont.
Alejandro Lapeyre
"dast" <dast@discussions.microsoft.com> escribió en el mensaje
news:587AB199-C447-47BA-A885-F339D67BEC88@microsoft.com...
> Hi,
>
> I'm successfully using Richard Grier's NETCommOCX software
> (www.hardandsoftware.com) to communicate with a device over the USB-port
> (with a USB-serial-converter) at 115200 bps.
>
> Now the device is beeing upgraded and the amount of information that has
> to
> be sent will increase so that 115200 bps won't be enough. I guess the next
> logical speed is 230400...
>
> NETCommOCX is said to have a top speed of 115200, so I unfortunately have
> to
> abandon that. What are my alternatives?
>
> I haven't found any similar freeware that seems to supports this speed.
> I think it could be done using API calls, but I have never used that, and
> from what I've read it seems a bit tricky. (Is it?)
>
> I'd be very thankfull for any help or suggestions on this.
> Best regards
> Daniel Strigard
- Next message: Zorpiedoman: "WindowsForm Resources"
- Previous message: steve: "installation woe(s)"
- In reply to: dast: ">115200 serial communication"
- Next in thread: *** Grier: "Re: >115200 serial communication"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]