Re: Winform vs Webform: how to choose?
From: alf (em_alf_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 10/27/04
- Next message: Bernie Yaeger: "Re: vb.net Excel version issue"
- Previous message: mmtkspec159: "automate 3rd party web page text submit with VB.net app"
- In reply to: Dean Slindee: "Winform vs Webform: how to choose?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 22:48:12 +0200
Only there are one adventage form webf. to winforms this is deploy.
Microsoft and other manufacture are crea thecnology to automatically deploy
like oneclick.
May be you use software in chached mode or simiare donwloading adn
installling /desinstalling automatica when you no use bat always when you
split you win and is a estupid idea use a powerfull pc only for rendering
html pages. is better spread along pc code al work millinon on processor and
no only one big processor in a webserver..
spanish man idea.
-_-
"Dean Slindee" <slindee@charter.net> escribió en el mensaje
news:10n34j686fcjdfa@corp.supernews.com...
>I would like to hear some practical comments about how to decide whether
>aly
> new application becomes a Winform vs a Webform application. Would you say
> that every app should be, by default, a Winform app unless it positively
> cannot be (for some technical reason). Or vice-versa?
> Obviously, Visual Studio could never be a Webform app because it requires
> a
> lot of CPU cycles.
> It appears to me that there is a broad sort of continuum in application
> characteristics. Some apps are natural Winform apps (VS Studio), while
> others are natural Webform apps (heavy textural content, non-updated).
> However, between these two poles, lies most of the rest of the today's
> apps.
> How do you decide which pole the new app should gravitate toward?
>
> Here is a quote from Alan Cooper, just to raise the temperature and get
> you
> started thinking (can you rebut this if you are a Webform afficionado):
> "The browser is a red herring; it's a dead end. The idea of having batched
> processing inside a very stupid program that's controlled remotely is a
> software architecture that was invented about 25 years ago by IBM, and was
> abandoned about 20 years ago because it's a bad architecture. We've gone
> tremendously retrograde by bringing in web browsers. We have stepped
> backward in terms of user interface, capability, and the breadth of our
> thinking about what we could do as a civilization. The browser is a very
> weak and stupid program because it was written as essentially a master's
> thesis inside a university and as an experiment."
>
> Thanks,
> Dean Slindee
>
>
- Next message: Bernie Yaeger: "Re: vb.net Excel version issue"
- Previous message: mmtkspec159: "automate 3rd party web page text submit with VB.net app"
- In reply to: Dean Slindee: "Winform vs Webform: how to choose?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
