Re: Decompiler.NET reverse engineers your CLS compliant code

Tech-Archive recommends: Repair Windows Errors & Optimize Windows Performance

From: Jonathan Pierce (support_at_junglecreatures.com)
Date: 09/25/04 

Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 20:03:28 GMT

<a> wrote in message news:%23fT8kezoEHA.1152@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
>
> Sorry but this was a joke to show you the kind of response that you would
> have given to your own post. It is funny that suddenly you talking about
> distorted perceptions.

Your attempted jokes make it difficult for everyone here to know what you
are referring to.
>
> There are 2 fundamental issues reported for your tool
Please identify them again for me since I don't know what you are referring
to. As far as Whidbey support goes, we do have a version that fully supports
all Whidbey constructs but requires the not yet released 2.0 runtime so we
can't make it our official product ion release yet. I don't know what other
issues you are referring to.

>and 3 bug reports. You simply ignored 3 of the issues as such and gave your
>own opinion rather than listening to users
We constantly solicit feedback and listen to users.
>. The 2 bug reports being left are minor sure but they have only been
>reported to show that your tool has bugs because you claimed it doesn't.
We never said that it wasn't possible for a bug to exist in our product. We
said that we have fixed any bugs that we know about whether we found them or
customers reported them to us.

It is easy to find more but you probably pissed people off enough

No one is pissed off here and everyone knows that all software may
potentially contain bugs. The important thing is that the bugs don't remain
outstanding and that customers are fully satisfied with resolutions that we
provide immediately to them to resolve any questions or issues that they
encounter.

> The whole discussion is pointless since it is $500 mediocre against $0
> cool
Our customers feel that our product is also cool and superior to the older
ones that you keep referring to.

> Even if some company wants to buy a high price product for whatever
> reason they will go Salamander because those guys are way more
> thrustworthy than you and your distored arguments.

Both our product and RemoteSoft's Salamander product serve a critical need
for the developer community by providing tools that customers feel provide
value to them that more than justifies their cost. We have intentionally
priced our product much lower than RemoteSoft to make it accessible to small
developers who might have other constraints that prevent them from
purchasing it. Most of our customers are business users who save money for
their employers by purchasing tools like ours that save them time whuch has
a real cost to their employers as well.

What is your reason for attempting to remain anonymous by using a generic
email address? This gives the impression that your posts are more likely to
contain inappropriate content and are not credible or even worth reading. If
you were willing to stand behind any of the statements that you keep making,
you would be willing to identify yourself openly and not be afraid to be
help accountable as I have done here.

Jonathan

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Delphi 2005 upgrade 2... not recommended
    ... > on your posting, however when I offered my opinion on the quote itself, ... > reports that are not actually bugs and all reported bugs have a process ... > customers are not very computer literate. ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: Decompiler.NET reverse engineers your CLS compliant code
    ... There are 2 fundamental issues reported for your tool and 3 bug reports. ... > identified two tiny bugs which we have already fixed. ... > We do not actively search our competitors web sites looking for their test ... Our customers agree that our product is the only one ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.vb)
  • Re: Delphi 8 common quality
    ... I do not find that forcing your customers to have to do things ... What about poor email reports? ... > from customers by any means when they are reporting bugs or issues. ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • 17 years before recovery, and the other side of the helpdesk is, umm.., as expected
    ... betting shop is a sports betting office in a typical British street, ... While one of our lesser-loved customers from ... The helpdesk is, for the most part, efficient. ... bugs, and detail said bugs to sufficient depth for the programmers to ...
    (alt.sysadmin.recovery)
  • Re: Special upgrade treatment
    ... |>C was still not what I will call my money's worth. ... C has "over 300 bugs" more than D. Though I'm ... customers is that it is in fact the most stable version we've provided since ... bugs immediately upon discovery makes it a rare case indeed that flaws are ...
    (comp.graphics.apps.lightwave)