Re: Decompiler.NET reverse engineers your CLS compliant code
a
Date: 09/24/04
- Next message: Cor Ligthert: "Re: Changing a Label control's text when moving a mouse over a button"
- Previous message: Cor Ligthert: "Re: Background color when control is disabled"
- In reply to: Jonathan Pierce: "Re: Decompiler.NET reverse engineers your CLS compliant code"
- Next in thread: Jonathan Pierce: "Re: Decompiler.NET reverse engineers your CLS compliant code"
- Reply: Jonathan Pierce: "Re: Decompiler.NET reverse engineers your CLS compliant code"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 00:48:29 -0700
I've posted some links with code examples above, hope this helps.
"Jonathan Pierce" <support@junglecreatures.com> wrote in message
news:MlH4d.42366$Ot3.1510@twister.nyc.rr.com...
> Please provide a specific example. We have no known outstanding bugs, and
> we recognize many constructs in code that Reflector misses. A good example
> is our elimination of goto statements in switch cases that Reflector does
> not eliminate. There are many other examples and we look forward to
> discussion reproduceable test cases with you.
>
> Jonathan
>
> <a> wrote in message news:epKRVfZoEHA.800@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
>> My testing shows that original Reflector creates better code and crash
>> less as your tool .
>>
>>
>> "Jonathan Pierce" <support@junglecreatures.com> wrote in message
>> news:0zw4d.1425$mH1.1794660@twister.nyc.rr.com...
>>>
>>> "Rick" <nospam> wrote in message
>>> news:usOPQGQoEHA.3792@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
>>>
>>>> Your Reflector tool will cost $500 compared to the real Reflector tool
>>>> which free?
>>>
>>> Our customers prefer the decompilation capability offered by the real
>>> Decompiler.NET.
>>>
>>> Our product has many other capabilities that Reflector doesn't include,
>>> and we have many more planned. Some of our customers have requested an
>>> ability to browse assemblies simiilar to the way the class browser in
>>> Visual Studio and other decompiler tools like Reflector allow. The
>>> prmary value in our Decompiler is it'c core decompilation capability
>>> that produces higher level and more accurate code that Reflector, so we
>>> would also have to add our decompiler to it, and all of our other
>>> features like our refactoring tools, and wouldn't be retaining much from
>>> it's original value aside from it's user interface and plugin
>>> architecture. We prefer to continue to sell our products as standalone
>>> tools and soon integrated into Visual Studio when 2005 ships.
>>>
>>> Jonathan
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
- Next message: Cor Ligthert: "Re: Changing a Label control's text when moving a mouse over a button"
- Previous message: Cor Ligthert: "Re: Background color when control is disabled"
- In reply to: Jonathan Pierce: "Re: Decompiler.NET reverse engineers your CLS compliant code"
- Next in thread: Jonathan Pierce: "Re: Decompiler.NET reverse engineers your CLS compliant code"
- Reply: Jonathan Pierce: "Re: Decompiler.NET reverse engineers your CLS compliant code"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]